Board paper

Organizational Behavior & Human Resource Management 2079 Board Question Paper

MGT 223 · Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Programme
BBS
Academic year
Second Year
Exam year
2079 BS
Sitting
regular
Full marks
100
Duration
180 minutes

Tribhuvan University

Faculty of Management

Office of the Dean

2079 BS / Regular Examination

Course: MGT 223 · Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Level: Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS) · Second Year

Full Marks: 100

Time: 3 hrs.

Candidates are required to give their answers in their own words as far as practicable. The figures in the margin indicate full marks.

Section A

Brief Answer Questions.

[10*2=20]
  1. What is cognitive dissonance?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Cognitive Dissonance

    Cognitive dissonance, propounded by Leon Festinger, is the state of internal psychological discomfort or tension experienced by an individual when holding two or more contradictory attitudes, beliefs, or when one’s overt behavior clashes with their core values.

    • To resolve this tension, individuals are motivated to alter their beliefs, modify their behavior, or rationalize the inconsistency.
  2. Point out any two factors affecting perception.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Two Factors Affecting Perception

    1. Internal Factors in the Perceiver: The individual’s personal attitudes, motives, past experiences, personality, and psychological expectations.
    2. External Factors in the Target / Stimulus: The novelty, motion, sound, size, background contrast, and intensity of the target object or person being observed.
  3. Define the term ‘emotion’.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Definition of Emotion

    An emotion is an intense, short-lived physiological and psychological feeling directed toward a specific person, event, or object.

    • Unlike general moods (which are long-lasting and lack an identified stimulus), emotions (e.g., anger, joy, fear, pride, surprise) are triggered by identifiable external events and drive immediate behavioral reactions.
  4. List out any two significance of informal groups.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Two Significance of Informal Groups

    1. Fulfilling Social and Affiliation Needs: Satisfies employees’ intrinsic psychological desires for friendship, acceptance, camaraderie, and emotional support, reducing workplace isolation.
    2. Facilitating Fast Communication (The Grapevine): Transmits informal information, social feedback, and organizational sentiment rapidly across rigid departmental silos.
  5. What do you mean by resistence to change?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Resistance to Change

    Resistance to change refers to any employee behavior, emotional opposition, or organizational inertia that aims to obstruct, undermine, or reject proposed modifications to organizational strategies, structures, technologies, or work routines, driven by fear of the unknown, loss of job security, or habit.

  6. List out any two objectives of human resource management.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Two Objectives of Human Resource Management

    1. Organizational Objective: Ensuring the availability of a skilled, competent, and motivated workforce to accomplish corporate strategic goals efficiently.
    2. Societal and Legal Objective: Ensuring complete legal compliance with national labor laws, ethical employment practices, and corporate social responsibility standards.
  7. Point out any two benefits of training.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Two Benefits of Training

    1. Elevated Employee Productivity: Enhances technical capabilities and operational proficiencies, increasing output volume and reducing material defects.
    2. Reduced Industrial Accidents & Waste: Educates workers on safe equipment handling and standardized operating procedures, drastically minimizing workplace injuries and equipment downtime.
  8. What is management development?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Management Development

    Management development is a systematic, long-term educational process designed to develop the conceptual, analytical, decision-making, and interpersonal capabilities of current and future executives, preparing them for higher managerial leadership roles.

  9. What is effective reward?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Effective Reward

    An effective reward is a compensation or recognition payout that is perceived as equitable, timely, highly valued by the recipient (high valence), and visibly contingent upon measurable individual or team performance achievements, successfully reinforcing productive organizational behaviors.

  10. What do you mean by green HRM?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Green HRM

    Green HRM refers to the integration of environmental management principles and ecological sustainability practices into human resource policies and processes—including paperless recruitment, green onboarding, environmental performance appraisals, and energy-saving workplace initiatives.

Section B

Attempt any FIVE questions.

[5*10=50]
  1. State and explain the different levels of OB analysis.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Levels of Organizational Behavior (OB) Analysis

    Organizational Behavior uses a multidisciplinary, layered framework analyzing human dynamics at three distinct levels:


    1. Individual Level of Analysis (Micro Level)

    The foundational building block of OB. It examines the psychological and behavioral characteristics of individual employees:

    • Core Variables: Personality traits, perceptual filters, cognitive attitudes, emotional intelligence, individual values, learning processes, and intrinsic motivation.
    • Managerial Focus: How individual attributes influence personal job satisfaction, task performance, stress levels, and absenteeism.

    2. Group Level of Analysis (Meso Level)

    Focuses on the social interactions and collective dynamics when two or more individuals work together:

    • Core Variables: Group structure, informal group norms, team cohesion, communication networks, leadership dynamics, power, politics, and interpersonal conflict.
    • Managerial Focus: How group synergy improves creative problem-solving, or how groupthink and social loafing erode team performance.

    3. Organizational System Level of Analysis (Macro Level)

    Examines the overarching institutional environment and systemic architecture:

    • Core Variables: Formal organizational design, corporate culture, change management, human resource policies, and adaptation to the external environment.
    • Managerial Focus: How organizational structures and shared cultural values shape collective workforce commitment and competitive agility.
  2. Distinguish between cognitive learning and social learning with an example.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Differences Between Cognitive Learning and Social Learning

    Dimension Cognitive Learning Social Learning
    Origin & Theorists Propounded by cognitive psychologists (Jean Piaget, Edward Tolman). Propounded by Albert Bandura.
    Core Focus Internal mental cognition, memory, information processing, and problem-solving. Observational learning, imitation, and behavioral modeling in social environments.
    Learning Mechanism Mental understanding of concepts, logical deduction, and cognitive mapping. Vicarious observation of models and the consequences of their behaviors.
    Role of Environment Emphasizes the learner’s conscious mental organization over external stimuli. Heavily dependent on social role models and environmental reinforcement.
    Practical Example An accountant studying the Nepal Financial Reporting Standards (NFRS) manual, logically analyzing complex deferred tax principles, and creating internal balance sheets based on theoretical understanding. A new banking teller sitting beside an experienced teller, observing how they greet customers, count cash accurately, defuse angry clients, and replicate those exact behaviors.
  3. How does Job satisfaction effect on employees’ performance? Describe.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Effect of Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance

    Job satisfaction is the positive, gratifying emotional state resulting from an appraisal of one’s job experiences, work culture, and compensation. Its influence on workplace performance manifests across several critical dimensions:

    1. Individual Task Performance and Productivity:

      • Satisfied employees display higher energy, lower cognitive distraction, and take personal pride in high workmanship quality.
      • Porter-Lawler Model Insight: Performance leads to intrinsic and extrinsic rewards; if these rewards are perceived as equitable, job satisfaction surges, which in turn reinforces future high performance.
    2. Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB):

      • High satisfaction fosters discretionary, extra-role behaviors—such as mentoring junior colleagues, volunteering for difficult projects, and speaking positively of the company—that go far beyond formal job descriptions.
    3. Reduction in Absenteeism:

      • Dissatisfied employees seize every pretext to take sick leaves and miss shifts. In contrast, satisfied employees demonstrate high attendance consistency and punctuality.
    4. Lower Voluntary Employee Turnover:

      • A satisfied workforce exhibits strong affective commitment, dramatically reducing the costly drain of skilled talent to competitor firms or overseas migration.
    5. Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality:

      • In service industries (banking, hospitality, healthcare), employee satisfaction directly translates into customer warmth, patience, and customer retention (the Service-Profit Chain).
    6. Mitigation of Workplace Deviance:

      • High satisfaction suppresses workplace deviance, such as theft, rumor-mongering, insubordination, and passive sabotage.
  4. Why is human resource planning (HRP) required in an organization? Explain.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Why Human Resource Planning (HRP) is Required in Organizations

    Human Resource Planning (HRP) is essential for organizational sustainability and strategic agility due to the following imperative reasons:

    1. Mitigating Future Talent Scarcity and Shortages:

      • Changes in technology, demographic retirements, and high labor migration create acute talent deficits. HRP systematically forecasts future human requirements to maintain an uninterrupted pipeline.
    2. Preventing Costly Overstaffing and Understaffing:

      • Overstaffing inflates payroll expenses and depresses labor productivity, while understaffing creates employee burnout, missed delivery deadlines, and lost market opportunities. HRP optimizes workforce sizing.
    3. Aligning Human Capital with Corporate Strategic Expansion:

      • When a company plans strategic diversifications (e.g., launching new branches or entering e-commerce), HRP ensures that the required talent with specialized proficiencies is ready when needed.
    4. Guiding Targeted Training and Succession Planning:

      • Identifies internal skill deficits and high-potential employees, enabling HR to design management development and smooth executive succession.
    5. Adapting to Technological and Environmental Disruptions:

      • Digitalization and AI require structural workforce realignment. HRP plans proactive reskilling to prevent mass employee obsolescence.
    6. Formulating Cost-Effective Recruitment and Selection Plans:

      • Eliminates expensive emergency hiring, allowing HR to negotiate favorable hiring channels, screen systematically, and onboard high-caliber talent.
  5. Explain in brief any two methods of performance appraisal.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Two Methods of Performance Appraisal

    Two widely utilized methods representing traditional and modern approaches are:


    1. Graphic Rating Scale Method (Traditional Method)

    • Concept: A widely used, printed or digital evaluation form listing a set of performance traits and job behaviors (e.g., quality of work, quantity of output, dependability, initiative, teamwork).
    • Process: The supervisor rates the employee on each trait along a continuum scale (typically ranging from 1 to 5, such as Unsatisfactory, Below Average, Average, Above Average, Outstanding).
    • Advantages: Highly standardized, inexpensive, easy to administer, and allows quantitative comparison across diverse job roles.
    • Limitations: Highly susceptible to rater cognitive biases, including the halo effect, central tendency error, and leniency/strictness bias.

    2. Management by Objectives - MBO (Modern / Results-Oriented Method)

    • Concept: Formulated by Peter Drucker, MBO evaluates employee performance based on the achievement of mutually agreed-upon, measurable, and time-bound goals.
    • Process:
      1. Goal Setting: Supervisor and subordinate collaboratively establish specific, challenging SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) targets aligned with corporate goals.
      2. Action Planning: The employee formulates the action plan and resources needed.
      3. Periodic Review: Ongoing progress tracking and milestone check-ins.
      4. Final Evaluation: Subordinate and supervisor jointly assess objective results achieved against agreed targets.
    • Advantages: Fosters high employee autonomy, role clarity, and intrinsic motivation, while eliminating subjective evaluator favoritism.
  6. What are the general guidelines in administrating employee’s discipline? Explain.

    [10]
    View model solution

    General Guidelines in Administering Employee Discipline

    Administering discipline requires balancing firm rule enforcement with human empathy, procedural fairness, and legal defensibility. The core guidelines include:


    1. Douglas McGregor’s “Red-Hot Stove Rule”

    The classic metaphor governing disciplinary administration specifies four fundamental principles:

    1. Immediate Warning (Burns Immediately): Discipline must be applied quickly following the infraction while the offense is fresh in mind.
    2. Advance Warning (Glows Red): Rules and consequences must be clear and communicated in advance so employees understand the boundaries.
    3. Consistency (Burns Every Time): The disciplinary penalty must be enforced consistently for every breach without arbitrary exceptions.
    4. Impersonality (Burns Anyone Who Touches It): The discipline penalizes the act, not the person, preserving individual dignity and avoiding personal grudges.

    2. Additional Essential Guidelines

    • Maintain Written Documentation: Meticulously record dates, witness statements, specific rule violations, and previous warnings to ensure legal defensibility under labor law.
    • Conduct Disciplinary Hearings in Private: Never reprimand an employee in front of peers, as public humiliation breeds deep hostility and defiance.
    • Ensure Natural Justice & the Right to Be Heard: Allow the employee an opportunity to explain their perspective and present mitigating circumstances before imposing penalties.
    • Follow Progressive Discipline: Escalate consequences incrementally (Verbal Warning \rightarrow Written Warning \rightarrow Suspension \rightarrow Termination), reserving severe penalties for chronic or extreme misconduct.

Section C

Attempt any TWO questions.

[2*15=30]
  1. Critically examine the major personality attributes influencing organizational behaviour.

    [15]
    View model solution

    Major Personality Attributes Influencing Organizational Behavior

    Personality attributes directly influence how individuals perceive their environment, interact with peers, respond to leadership, handle stress, and execute job tasks.


    Critical Examination of Major Personality Attributes

    1. Locus of Control

    • Internals (Internal Locus): Believe they control their own destiny; success and failure stem from personal effort, skill, and choices.
      • OB Impact: High job performance, proactive initiative, low absenteeism, and superior problem-solving; excel in non-routine, autonomous managerial roles.
    • Externals (External Locus): Attribute life outcomes to luck, fate, powerful superiors, or external circumstances.
      • OB Impact: Passive, more compliant with authoritative supervision, but more prone to depression, work stress, and learned helplessness.

    2. Machiavellianism (“High Mach” vs. “Low Mach”)

    • Named after Niccolò Machiavelli, it measures the degree to which an individual is pragmatic, maintains emotional detachment, and believes that “the end justifies the means.”
      • High Machs: Excel in face-to-face negotiations, competitive sales, and political bargaining; however, they can erode interpersonal trust, sabotage team collaboration, and engage in unethical behavior.
      • Low Machs: Driven by ethics, emotional empathy, and interpersonal loyalty; thrive in collaborative team settings.

    3. Self-Esteem (SE)

    • The degree to which an individual likes or dislikes themselves and perceives their intrinsic self-worth.
      • High SE: High expectations for success, resilient under failure, seek challenging jobs, and exhibit high job satisfaction.
      • Low SE: Susceptible to external influence, seek approval from superiors, and experience higher workplace stress.

    4. Self-Monitoring

    • An individual’s ability to adjust their behavior to external, situational, and social cues.
      • High Self-Monitors: Highly adaptable chameleons who adjust their communication across diverse groups, excelling in cross-cultural leadership and client-facing roles; however, they may appear inconsistent or politically insincere.
      • Low Self-Monitors: Consistent, authentic, and express true feelings regardless of situation, but may struggle with diplomatic tact.

    5. Risk Propensity

    • A person’s willingness to take chances and make rapid decisions under uncertainty.
      • High Risk-Takers: Excel in venture capital, stock trading, and entrepreneurial startups, making swift decisions with incomplete data.
      • Low Risk-Takers: Methodical and conservative; excel in auditing, accounting, and safety engineering where mistakes are catastrophic.

    6. Type A and Type B Personality Dimensions

    • Type A: Aggressive competitiveness, chronic time urgency, impatience, and multitasking; prone to cardiovascular disease and workplace burnout.
    • Type B: Relaxed, patient, reflective, and non-competitive; often make superior strategic, senior executive leaders.
  2. Discuss the nature and sources of conflict in organization. Is conflict always bad? Why or why not?

    [15]
    View model solution

    Nature and Definition of Organizational Conflict

    Organizational Conflict is a dynamic process in which an individual or group perceives that another individual or group has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that they care about.

    It stems from incompatible goals, differing interpretations of facts, behavioral expectations, or competition over scarce resources.


    Sources of Conflict in Organizations

    1. Structural Sources:

      • Resource Scarcity: Departmental competition for limited budgets, personnel, equipment, and office space.
      • Task Interdependence: When the output of one team depends sequentially or reciprocally on the timely input of another (e.g., Sales waiting for Production).
      • Jurisdictional Ambiguity: Unclear task boundaries and overlapping reporting lines where accountability is undefined.
      • Status and Power Inequities: Resentment arising from perceived imbalances in rewards, authority, or privileges.
    2. Personal and Communication Sources:

      • Communication Distortions: Semantic misunderstandings, information hoarding, noise, and inadequate feedback across departments.
      • Personality Clashes: Incompatibilities in values, authoritarian personalities, and differing risk tolerances.
      • Perceptual Differences: Diverse educational backgrounds and specialized departmental horizons leading to conflicting priorities.

    Is Conflict Always Bad? (The Interactionist Perspective)

    No, conflict is not always bad. Contemporary organizational behavior recognizes two distinct forms:

    1. When Conflict is Good (Functional Conflict):

    • Stimulates Innovation & Creativity: Challenges complacency, encourages questioning of outdated orthodoxies, and drives creative alternative solutions.
    • Prevents Groupthink: Encourages critical dissent, vigorous debate, and thorough risk analysis during strategic executive decision-making.
    • Enhances Group Cohesion: Facing external constructive rivalry often unifies internal team members around shared targets.
    • Facilitates Self-Evaluation & Change: Signals operational deficiencies that require structural restructuring before catastrophic failure occurs.

    2. When Conflict is Bad (Dysfunctional Conflict):

    • Eats Up Time and Energy: Diverts organizational attention from strategic goals toward political infighting, rumor-mongering, and backstabbing.
    • Erodes Trust and Psychological Safety: Destroys team communication and cross-departmental collaboration.
    • Triggers Employee Burnout and Turnover: Escalates toxic stress, chronic absenteeism, and the loss of talented staff.

    Conclusion:

    Conflict is beneficial when managed at an optimal, moderate level focused on tasks and ideas (task conflict), while destructive when it degenerates into personal animosities (relationship conflict).

  3. How do decision markers & senior management realize the need for managing talent in the organization? Discuss.

    [15]
    View model solution

    Realizing the Need for Talent Management

    Talent Management is the strategic, integrated framework of attracting, onboarding, developing, retaining, and mobilizing high-potential, top-performing employees to drive sustainable competitive advantage.

    Decision-makers and senior management realize the urgent necessity of talent management when confronted by compelling strategic realities and operational disruptions:


    Key Drivers Realized by Senior Leadership

    1. Strategic Capability and Competitive Edge:

    • In modern knowledge-based economies (finance, IT, telecommunications, professional services), physical assets and software can be replicated, but human talent and specialized intellectual capital cannot. Leadership recognizes that market differentiation hinges strictly on human ingenuity.

    2. The High Cost of Unplanned Employee Turnover:

    • The departure of key leaders, software architects, or top sales executives incurs immense direct replacement costs (recruitment agency fees, onboarding overhead) and catastrophic indirect losses (lost client relationships, operational delays, and brain drain to competitors).

    3. Critical Succession and Leadership Voids:

    • Senior leadership experiences a crisis when key executives retire or abruptly resign and the organization discovers it has no qualified internal talent ready to step up, forcing risky and expensive emergency external hiring.

    4. The “War for Talent” and Global Mobility:

    • In developing nations like Nepal, aggressive global recruitment and brain drain deplete local labor pools of top young talent. Executives realize they must provide compelling employee value propositions (EVPs) to retain talent locally.

    5. Fast-Paced Technological and Business Transformation:

    • Adapting to AI, automation, and digital platforms requires an agile, highly capable workforce. Leadership recognizes that obsolete talent bases paralyze corporate transformation.

    Strategic Dimensions of an Integrated Talent Management System

    1. Strategic Talent Acquisition: Establishing an attractive employer brand and targeted talent scouting to attract top-tier talent.
    2. Accelerated High-Potential Development: Formulating tailored executive development tracks, cross-functional rotations, and executive mentorship for key contributors.
    3. Robust Succession Planning: Systematically mapping talent grids (such as the 9-Box Talent Matrix) to identify potential successors for all mission-critical roles.
    4. Tailored Retention Strategies: Offering competitive equity compensation, autonomy, career growth roadmaps, and psychological recognition to keep high performers engaged.