Tribhuvan University
Faculty of Management
Office of the Dean
Official Model Question Paper / Dean's Office Blueprint
Candidates are required to give their answers in their own words as far as practicable. Figures in the margin indicate full marks.
Group A
Brief Answer Questions. Attempt ALL questions. (5 × 2 = 10)
[5*2=10]- [2]
Define the Tourism Multiplier Effect and mention its three constituent components.
View model solution
The Tourism Multiplier Effect
The tourism multiplier effect measures the total secondary and tertiary economic impact generated within an economy by an initial injection of tourist expenditure.
Three Components:
- Direct Effect: Immediate revenue received by frontline tourism businesses (hotels, airlines, restaurants).
- Indirect Effect: Secondary spending by tourism businesses purchasing goods and services from domestic supply chains (e.g., hotels buying farm produce).
- Induced Effect: Increased consumer spending by tourism employees using their wages in the general economy.
- [2]
What is ‘economic leakage’ in international tourism? State two common sources.
View model solution
Economic Leakage in Tourism
Economic leakage refers to the portion of gross tourism revenue that is lost or remitted back to foreign economies rather than retained in the host country’s domestic economy.
Two Common Sources:
- Importation of foreign food, luxury beverages, aviation fuel, and high-tech equipment.
- Repatriation of profits and management fees by foreign-owned hotel chains and overseas tour operators.
- [2]
Define Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) endorsed by the UNWTO.
View model solution
Tourism Satellite Account (TSA)
A Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) is an international standard macroeconomic accounting framework approved by the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) that measures the true size, gross value added (GVA), employment, and fiscal contributions of tourism to the National Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- [2]
Explain Price Elasticity of Demand (PED) in tourism and state why leisure travel is price elastic.
View model solution
Price Elasticity of Demand (PED) in Tourism
PED measures the responsiveness of tourist demand (visitor numbers or travel bookings) to a percentage change in the price of travel products:
Leisure travel is typically highly price elastic (
) because holiday travel is a discretionary luxury that consumers can easily postpone, substitute with cheaper destinations, or abandon if prices escalate. - [2]
Differentiate between visible and invisible exports in international balance of payments.
View model solution
Visible vs. Invisible Exports
- Visible Exports: Cross-border trade in physical, tangible merchandise (e.g., Nepal exporting carpets, tea, or pashmina garments).
- Invisible Exports: International trade in intangible services; inbound foreign tourism is a major invisible export because foreign travelers spend external foreign exchange inside the host nation without physical goods crossing borders.
Group B
Short Answer Questions. Attempt any THREE questions. (3 × 10 = 30)
[3*10=30]- [10]
Explain the mechanics of the Keynesian Tourism Multiplier. Calculate the total economic output generated by an initial tourist expenditure of Rs 50,000,000 when the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 0.75 and the Marginal Propensity to Import / Leakage (MPL) is 0.15.
View model solution
Mechanics and Mathematical Computation of the Tourism Multiplier
The tourism multiplier illustrates how successive rounds of resending generate cumulative national income from an initial expenditure injection.
1. Mathematical Formulation
In an open economy with imports (leakages), the multiplier coefficient (
) is given by: Where:
(Marginal Propensity to Consume domestic goods) = 0.75 (Marginal Propensity to Import / Leakage) = 0.15
2. Calculation of Multiplier Coefficient (
) 3. Total Economic Output Generated (
) 4. Economic Interpretation
- The initial autonomous injection of Rs 50 million in tourist spending creates a total cumulative economic expansion of Rs 125 million across the economy.
- The multiplier of 2.5 means that every single rupee spent by an international tourist generates Rs 2.50 in overall domestic economic turnover through subsequent rounds of supplier purchasing and employee household consumption.
- [10]
Discuss the contribution of inbound tourism to Nepal’s foreign exchange earnings, employment generation, and regional balance. What economic policies can reduce foreign exchange leakage?
View model solution
Contribution of Tourism to Nepal’s Economy and Leakage Mitigation
Inbound tourism serves as a major engine of foreign exchange generation and labor-intensive employment in Nepal.
1. Macroeconomic Contributions
- Foreign Exchange Reserves: International tourism contributes a vital share of convertible foreign currency reserves, essential for servicing external national debt and financing capital imports.
- Direct & Indirect Employment: Tourism creates decentralized employment across a broad spectrum—from high-altitude mountain guides and porters to hospitality managers, drivers, and local organic farmers.
- Regional Economic Dispersion: Unlike conventional manufacturing clustered in urban industrial corridors, trekking, mountaineering, and homestay tourism inject capital directly into remote, impoverished mountain districts (Solukhumbu, Mustang, Dolpo, Humla).
2. Strategies to Reduce Foreign Exchange Leakage
- Domestic Agriculture Linkages: Mandate and incentivize hotels and mountain teahouses to source vegetables, dairy, poultry, and meat from local farm cooperatives rather than importing canned foods.
- Promotion of Local Building Materials: Utilize indigenous stone, slate, timber, and terracotta instead of imported concrete and steel for tourism infrastructure.
- Domestic Airline and Supply Chain Ownership: Support domestic carriers and local DMCs to minimize commissions paid to overseas tour wholesalers.
- Developing Domestic Craft and Souvenir Industries: Enforce authentic Made-in-Nepal certifications for handicrafts, carpets, and tea to prevent the resale of cheap imported replicas.
- [10]
Analyze the impact of exchange rate fluctuations and domestic inflation on international tourist demand and destination competitiveness.
View model solution
Exchange Rates, Inflation, and Destination Competitiveness in Tourism
International travel demand is sensitive to relative price competitiveness shaped by real exchange rates and purchasing power parity.
1. Effects of Domestic Currency Depreciation (NPR weakening vs. USD/EUR)
- Positive Demand Effect: A weaker domestic currency makes hotel rooms, guiding services, meals, and souvenirs significantly cheaper in foreign currency terms, enhancing price competitiveness and stimulating inbound visitor arrivals.
- Downside Inflationary Pressures: Depreciation inflates the cost of imported aviation turbine fuel, imported motor vehicles, and specialized climbing equipment, increasing operational overheads for domestic tour operators.
2. Effects of Domestic Inflation
- Relative Price Escalation: If domestic inflation in the host country exceeds inflation in competing regional destinations (e.g., Thailand, India, Sri Lanka), the destination becomes relatively more expensive, dampening tourist arrivals and average length of stay.
- Erosion of Profit Margins: Fixed contracted group rates (quoted 12 months in advance) cannot be easily adjusted, squeezing profit margins for travel agencies when domestic food, fuel, and transport costs spike.
- [10]
Explain Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) in public tourism infrastructure development. How are environmental and social externalities monetized?
View model solution
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) in Public Tourism Infrastructure
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is a systematic appraisal method used by governments and planning commissions to assess whether the total socio-economic benefits of a proposed tourism project (such as an airport or highway) outweigh its total costs.
1. Direct Costs and Benefits
- Direct Costs: Land acquisition, engineering construction, operational maintenance, and public financing interest.
- Direct Benefits: User fees, landing fees, toll collections, and direct tax revenues.
2. Monetizing Non-Market Externalities
- Environmental Valuation Techniques:
- Contingent Valuation Method (CVM): Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) surveys asking tourists how much they would pay to preserve pristine forest vistas or prevent river pollution.
- Travel Cost Method (TCM): Calculating the economic value of a national park based on the travel expenses visitors willingly incur to reach it.
- Hedonic Pricing Method: Estimating the environmental premium reflected in hotel room rates located near pristine natural attractions vs. congested areas.
- Social Externalities: Quantifying the social costs of road congestion, noise pollution, displaced indigenous farmers, and increased waste treatment burdens.
Group C
Comprehensive Answer / Case Analysis Question. (1 × 20 = 20)
[1*20=20]- [20]
Read the following scenario and answer the questions:
The Ministry of Tourism in Nepal is evaluating an economic proposal to build a 25-kilometer modern Cable Car project connecting the town of Birethanti (Nayapul) directly to Ghorepani / Poon Hill in the Annapurna Conservation Area. Financial projections estimate construction costs at USD 45 million. Promoters argue the project will generate massive economic returns: 400,000 annual day-trippers paying $35 per ticket, immediate employment for 200 technical staff, and rapid access for elderly visitors. Conversely, local lodge associations, trekking guides, and environmental economists strongly object: they argue the cable car will eradicate the multi-day trekking economy, bankrupt over 120 family-run teahouses, displace 1,500 porters and guides, destroy pristine rhododendron cloud forests, and result in 80% economic leakage since the project is funded and operated by a multinational consortium repatriating all profits offshore.
Questions: a. Conduct a rigorous Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) contrasting the claims of the cable car promoters against the losses of the traditional trekking economy. b. Analyze the concepts of economic leakage, local multiplier degradation, and wealth polarization associated with this capital-intensive mega-project. c. Formulate a comprehensive Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) framework incorporating shadow pricing, environmental valuation, and employment displacement. d. Propose an equitable policy resolution and alternative sustainable tourism development model for the Poon Hill region.
View model solution
Case Analysis: Economic and Social Assessment of Poon Hill Cable Car Project
a. Comparative Economic Impact Assessment (EIA)
Economic Dimension Cable Car Mega-Project (Promoters’ Claim) Traditional Multi-Day Trekking Economy Annual Visitor Volume & Type 400,000 short-duration day-trippers (high volume, 3-hour dwell time). 80,000 slow-travel adventure trekkers (high duration: 4–6 days). Direct Revenue Generation ticket revenue concentrated in corporate hands. dispersed across local teahouses. Employment Generation ~200 centralized technical and administrative jobs. ~1,500 decentralized livelihoods: guides, porters, lodge cooks, and mule drivers. Geographic Wealth Distribution Centralized at corporate terminal stations (Nayapul and Poon Hill ridge). Equitably distributed across multiple trailside villages (Tikhedhunga, Ulleri, Banthanti, Ghorepani).
b. Economic Leakage and Multiplier Degradation
- Severe Capital Leakage: The multinational concessionaire will repatriate debt repayments, engineering royalties, and equity dividends offshore. An estimated 75%–80% of cable car revenue will leak out of the Annapurna region and Nepal.
- Collapse of the Local Economic Multiplier: In traditional trekking, a trekker’s daily spending ($40) is spent on local mountain potatoes, yak cheese, eggs, firewood, and porter wages, circulating 3 to 4 times within the local community. The cable car bypasses these village supply chains completely.
- Wealth Polarization & Structural Poverty: Transforming 120 self-employed teahouse entrepreneurs and 1,500 independent mountain guides into unemployed citizens, while consolidating tourism wealth into a single corporate balance sheet.
c. Comprehensive Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Framework
Where:
= Direct ticket and concession revenues. = Capital construction ($45M) and annual operational maintenance costs. = Environmental damage costs: clear-cutting pristine ancient rhododendron forests, loss of biodiversity, slope destabilization, and visual landscape pollution. = Social displacement costs: lost income and retraining costs for 1,500 displaced guides/porters and asset depreciation of 120 stranded teahouses. = Social discount rate (recommended: 8%–10% for developing economy public appraisal).
Conclusion of CBA: When factoring in environmental destruction (
) and social livelihood losses ( ), the true Social Net Present Value (SNPV) is negative, making the project socially and environmentally unviable.
d. Policy Resolution and Sustainable Development Alternative
- Moratorium on Mega-Cable Cars in Core Wilderness Zones: Legally restrict cable car developments to urban foothills and designated pilgrimage corridors (e.g., Chandragiri, Manakamana), banning them inside fragile Annapurna Conservation Area Project (ACAP) core zones.
- Alternative Model: Low-Impact Trail Upgrades & Cultural Trekking: Invest public funds into building stone-paved eco-trails, solar-powered water filtration stations, and compost sanitation systems along the existing Nayapul-Ghorepani route.
- Community-Owned Electric Shuttles on Peripheral Roads: Allow local village cooperatives to operate subsidized electric mini-buses on existing peripheral motor tracks to provide accessibility for elderly locals without destroying trekking paths.
- Expanding High-Yield Experiential Products: Promote specialized botanical tours (rhododendron blossom season), night-sky astrophotography camps, and organic farm-to-table culinary homestays to increase average tourist expenditure and length of stay.