MGT 225

Entrepreneurship

TU BBS · Fourth Year · Four-year BBS curriculum

Requirement
required
Full marks
100
Study Guide
7 units available

Chapter notes

Authoritative study guide across 7 syllabus units

Open a unit to read its study notes.

Unit 1: Introduction· 20 LHs· ~14 marks

Entrepreneurship Examination Focus: In TU examination questions, students often provide superficial, overlapping definitions of entrepreneur and manager without contrasting risk-bearing, resource allocation, and reward mechanisms, losing 4 out of 10 marks on comparative analytical questions.


Core Concepts and Terminology: Introduction

In business economics and management studies, understanding the dynamic triad of entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, and enterprise forms the bedrock of new venture creation. These three terms represent the actor, the process, and the organizational entity:

  1. The Entrepreneur (The Actor): An entrepreneur is an innovative individual who identifies commercial or social opportunities within an uncertain economic environment, gathers and allocates necessary resources (capital, labor, technology, and materials), undertakes calculated financial, psychological, and operational risks, and creates an enterprise to capture economic value. Rather than merely reacting to market conditions, the entrepreneur acts as an agent of change.
  2. Entrepreneurship (The Process): Entrepreneurship is the purposeful, creative, and risk-taking process of conceptualizing, organizing, launching, and scaling a business venture. It encompasses opportunity discovery, resource mobilization, business model design, innovation execution, and value creation under conditions of market friction and uncertainty.
  3. The Enterprise (The Object/Entity): The enterprise is the institutional vehicle, legal entity, and operational structure created by the entrepreneur. It manifests as a business firm—such as a sole proprietorship, partnership, private limited company, or social cooperative—that delivers products, services, employment, and returns to stakeholders.

The relational dynamic functions sequentially:

  • The Entrepreneur (the visionary individual) drives
  • Entrepreneurship (the strategic, innovative, and operational process) which establishes
  • The Enterprise (the tangible legal and commercial entity).
Dimension Entrepreneur Entrepreneurship Enterprise
Basic Meaning The visionary individual or founding team The behavioral and organizational process The commercial or social institution created
Nature Human catalyst and strategic decision-maker Creative, systemic, and risk-assuming act Tangible legal and operational apparatus
Primary Input Vision, competencies, grit, and initiative Opportunity sensing and resource orchestration Physical, financial, and intellectual capital
Output / Reward Profit, equity capital gain, self-actualization Innovation, economic change, and productivity Goods, services, tax revenues, and employment
Nepalese Example Biswas Dhakal (Tech entrepreneur) Digital payment innovation and agent network build-out F1Soft International / eSewa

2-Mark Focus: Crisp Examination Definitions

  • Entrepreneur: An individual who organizes, manages, and assumes the market and financial risks of a new business venture to exploit an identified opportunity for profit or social impact.
  • Intrapreneur: An entrepreneurial employee working within an established corporation who is granted operational autonomy, budget, and resources to innovate new products, services, or internal processes without bearing personal financial equity risk.
  • Enterprise: A legally recognized business unit or operational undertaking established to produce goods, deliver services, and mobilize economic resources.

2. Historical Evolution of the Entrepreneurship Concept

The conceptual understanding of entrepreneurship has evolved across four distinct economic epochs:

  • Early Origins (17th & 18th Century - French Economic Thought): The word originates from the French verb entreprendre, meaning “to undertake.” Richard Cantillon (1755) first defined the entrepreneur as an economic agent who buys raw materials or goods at a certain price today to sell at an uncertain price in the future, establishing risk-bearing as the foundational pillar of entrepreneurship. Jean-Baptiste Say (1803) broadened this concept, asserting that the entrepreneur shifts economic resources out of an area of lower productivity into an area of higher productivity and greater yield.
  • Classical and Neoclassical Era (Late 19th Century): Neoclassical economists such as Alfred Marshall integrated entrepreneurship into classical production theory, designating organization and management as the fourth factor of production alongside land, labor, and capital. Marshall emphasized that the entrepreneur coordinates productive factors, anticipates market fluctuations, and continuously improves production techniques.
  • Schumpeterian Modern Era (Mid-20th Century): Joseph Schumpeter (1934) revolutionized the discipline by decoupling entrepreneurship from routine business ownership. In Schumpeterian theory, the entrepreneur is strictly an innovator who introduces “new combinations” that trigger creative destruction (schöpferische Zerstörung). Schumpeter posited that dynamic economic development occurs when obsolete production methods and legacy monopolies are swept away by innovative new ventures.
  • Behavioral and Modern Opportunity-Discovery Era (Late 20th Century to Present): Israel Kirzner (1973) conceptualized the entrepreneur as alert to existing market disequilibrium and price arbitrage. Peter Drucker (1985) emphasized that entrepreneurship is a systematic discipline centered on searching for change, responding to it, and exploiting it as an opportunity. Contemporary scholars (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000) view entrepreneurship as the study of how, by whom, and with what effects opportunities to create future goods and services are discovered, evaluated, and exploited.

3. Characteristics, Qualities, and Behavioral Traits of Successful Entrepreneurs

Empirical research across global and Nepalese business environments reveals that successful entrepreneurs exhibit a distinct constellation of psychological traits, operational competencies, and behavioral habits:

  1. Calculated Risk-Taking: True entrepreneurs avoid blind gambling as well as riskless stagnation. They systematically evaluate worst-case scenarios, conduct market feasibility studies, structure risk-mitigation contingencies, and commit resources only when prospective rewards outweigh calculated hazards.
  2. High Need for Achievement (n-Ach): As demonstrated by David McClelland, entrepreneurs are propelled by an intense intrinsic drive to excel, achieve measurable milestones, and master difficult challenges, rather than being driven solely by monetary wealth.
  3. Internal Locus of Control: Successful founders believe that their own choices, hard work, persistence, and strategic agility dictate their success, rather than external fate, luck, or political connections.
  4. Tolerance for Ambiguity and Resilience: New ventures inevitably confront volatile market demands, supply chain bottlenecks, regulatory shifts, and financial squeezes. Entrepreneurs display psychological resilience, pivoting operational tactics while maintaining strategic focus.
  5. Vision and Opportunity Recognition: Entrepreneurs possess perceptual alertness that enables them to notice consumer pain points, market shortages, and technological disruptions that conventional managers overlook.
  6. Decisiveness and Initiative: Founders take proactive steps without waiting for formal directives or complete information, executing decisions swiftly and adjusting based on real-time feedback.
  7. Persuasive Communication and Networking: Venture creation requires convincing skeptical angel investors, attracting talented employees away from secure corporate jobs, negotiating credit terms with suppliers, and building customer trust from scratch.

4. Entrepreneurial Motivation and Feelings

The psychological forces that propel individuals into venture creation fall into two overarching motivational paradigms:

Push versus Pull Motivational Factors

  • Pull Factors (Opportunity-Driven Motivation): Positive market incentives and internal desires that attract individuals into entrepreneurship. These include the desire for operational independence, personal autonomy, wealth accumulation, creative self-expression, social prestige, and the excitement of bringing a novel solution to life. For example, a software engineer resigning from an established IT firm in Kathmandu to launch an artificial intelligence startup is driven by pull dynamics.
  • Push Factors (Necessity-Driven Motivation): Negative socioeconomic pressures that force individuals into venture creation due to a lack of viable alternatives. These include structural unemployment, underemployment, job loss, low corporate salaries, family economic distress, and career stagnation. In Nepal, many rural youth and returning migrant workers establish small poultry farms, retail stores, or tailoring units driven primarily by push dynamics to secure basic family livelihoods.

The Psychology of Entrepreneurial Feelings

The subjective emotional journey of entrepreneurship involves intense psychological states:

  • The Passion for Venture Creation: An intense positive feeling that fuels persistent work hours and sustains energy during cash-strapped initial phases.
  • The Burden of Ultimate Responsibility: Unlike salaried employees who leave their job duties at the office, founders bear continuous psychological accountability for payroll obligations, loan repayments, client commitments, and enterprise survival.
  • The Rollercoaster of Highs and Lows: Founders experience sharp emotional oscillations—from euphoria during an equity funding round or large client acquisition, to acute anxiety when faced with tax scrutiny, employee departure, or severe liquidity crunches.

5. Major Functions and Types of Entrepreneurship

Major Functions of an Entrepreneur

  1. Opportunity Identification: Scanning local, national, and international environments to discover unmet consumer demands, price discrepancies, and technological voids.
  2. Innovation and Product Development: Introducing new goods, enhanced features, alternative distribution channels, or cost-saving production methodologies.
  3. Resource Assembly and Mobilization: Procuring equity capital, negotiating supplier credit, securing office or factory leases, and recruiting key managerial and technical talent.
  4. Organization Building and Authority Delegation: Designing operational workflows, organizational reporting hierarchies, compensation packages, and standard operating procedures.
  5. Risk and Uncertainty Management: Assuming ultimate legal and financial liability for commercial debts and navigating competitive retaliation.

Structural Types of Entrepreneurship

  • Innovative Entrepreneurship: Characterized by the aggressive introduction of novel products, pioneering technologies, or brand-new business models (e.g., introduction of app-based ride-hailing in Nepal).
  • Imitative / Adoptive Entrepreneurship: Replicating and contextualizing successful foreign or urban business models within local markets, saving substantial R&D expenditure while reducing market trial risks (e.g., local cafe chains adopting the Starbucks business model in Pokhara and Kathmandu).
  • Fabian Entrepreneurship: Highly cautious, skeptical, and traditional entrepreneurs who introduce changes only when clear market pressures or competitive survival mandates adoption.
  • Drone Entrepreneurship: Rigidly traditional operators who refuse to alter their operational methods or adopt new technologies even when suffering continuous financial losses (e.g., traditional brick kilns refusing to adopt zig-zag energy-efficient kilns until forced by environmental regulations).
  • Scalable Startup Entrepreneurship: Fast-growing technology or venture-backed enterprises designed from inception to scale rapidly across regional or global markets.
  • Small Business Entrepreneurship: Localized, self-financed family-owned micro, cottage, and small businesses oriented around sustaining a comfortable family livelihood rather than achieving aggressive corporate scale.

6. The Entrepreneurial Process

The entrepreneurial journey is not a random gamble; it is an iterative, multi-stage process that transforms an abstract concept into an operational enterprise.

The Entrepreneurial Process
The Entrepreneurial Process

Phase 1: Opportunity Identification and Evaluation

  • Scanning the economic, technological, sociocultural, and regulatory environment.
  • Evaluating market size, competitive intensity, customer willingness to pay, and window of opportunity.
  • Conducting preliminary feasibility checks to filter unviable ideas before financial commitment.

Phase 2: Developing the Business Plan

  • Formulating a comprehensive, written roadmap detailing commercial vision, marketing strategies, operational processes, organizational staffing, and financial forecasts.
  • Projecting working capital requirements, pro forma balance sheets, cash flow schedules, and break-even thresholds.

Phase 3: Resource Determination and Mobilization

  • Calculating the precise quantum of initial capital needed.
  • Distinguishing between bootstrapping personal savings, seeking family loans, bringing in angel investors, or securing formal bank loans.
  • Procuring physical machinery, technical tools, intellectual property licenses, and hiring founding core staff.

Phase 4: Enterprise Launch, Management, and Growth

  • Legally registering the business entity at local wards, the Office of the Company Registrar, and Inland Revenue Department.
  • Executing commercial launch, monitoring customer feedback loops, stabilizing operational delivery, and reinvesting operating cash flows to scale market share.

7. Comparative Analysis: Entrepreneur vs Manager vs Intrapreneur vs Owner-Manager

Students frequently confuse these roles in university examinations. The following analytical matrix delineates their boundaries:

Basis of Comparison Entrepreneur Traditional Manager Intrapreneur Owner-Manager
Primary Motive Independence, innovation, market creation, capital gains Career progression, organizational power, salary security Creative autonomy, internal innovation, corporate recognition Stable family livelihood, self-employment, independence
Status in Organization Founder, owner, and equity controller Salaried employee hired by board/owners Salaried corporate employee with internal project mandate Founder-owner of small or medium enterprise
Risk Exposure Bears full financial, legal, and reputational risk Bears minimal financial risk; risks career or job tenure Bears no personal equity risk; risks corporate reputation Bears personal and family financial risk
Primary Activity Creating new combinations, vision setting Directing, organizing, controlling daily operations Developing new products/units inside an existing firm Managing daily store/plant operations and sales
Reaction to Failure Views failure as a learning iteration; may pivot Avoids failure; risks termination or demotion Shielded by corporate parent; projects can be written off Highly vulnerable; failure threatens family solvency
Reward / Return Net enterprise profits, equity value appreciation Monthly salary, performance bonuses, perks Fixed salary, innovation bonuses, promotion Business operating profits, drawings for household
Nepalese Example Upendra Mahato (Founder, investor) CEO of Nabil Bank managing banking operations Team lead at Chaudhary Group launching a new beverage line Owner of a localized hardware store in Biratnagar

8. Modern Dimensions of Entrepreneurship

Contemporary business practice has expanded far beyond traditional industrial manufacturing into specialized dimensions:

  1. Intrapreneurship (Corporate Entrepreneurship): Encouraging employees within large organizations to act like entrepreneurs. Corporations like 3M (which created Post-it Notes through internal employee experimentation) and Google (giving 20% time for personal projects) institutionalized this. In Nepal, telecommunications providers (such as Ncell and Nepal Telecom) foster intrapreneurship by forming dedicated internal digital innovation units to create value-added digital services and entertainment applications.
  2. Technopreneurship: Entrepreneurship rooted in cutting-edge science, software, engineering, and digital technology. Technopreneurs build scalable intellectual property, software platforms, and hardware devices. Examples in Nepal include Incessant Rain Animation Studios (producing high-end VFX for Hollywood productions) and F1Soft International (architecting digital banking backends for commercial banks).
  3. Netpreneurship (Internet/E-Entrepreneurship): Ventures whose core commercial model operates over the internet and digital platforms. Netpreneurs leverage cloud computing, social commerce, and mobile applications to eliminate physical showroom overheads. Examples include online marketplaces like Daraz Nepal, specialized e-commerce sites like SastoDeal, and home-grown digital brands like Urban Girl (UG Cakes).
  4. Ecopreneurship (Green Entrepreneurship): Business ventures that directly address environmental degradation, carbon emissions, and resource depletion through commercially viable green products. Ecopreneurs balance ecological stewardship with profitability. In Nepal, Doko Recyclers (waste management and material recovery), Himalayan Climate Initiative’s social ventures, and firms producing biodegradable areca nut leaf plates in eastern Nepal exemplify ecopreneurship.
  5. Social Entrepreneurship: Creating ventures whose primary mission is solving deep-seated social, educational, healthcare, or economic inequality issues rather than maximizing shareholder dividends. Profits are largely reinvested into the social mission. Dr. Mahabir Pun’s work with the National Innovation Center (NIC) and rural wireless internet networks across mountainous districts represents a prominent Nepalese benchmark.

9. Role of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development and Employment Generation in Nepal

In a developing economy characterized by high youth migration, a severe trade deficit, and geographic barriers, entrepreneurship serves vital macroeconomic and social functions:

  • Employment Generation and Brain-Drain Reversal: Over 600,000 young Nepalese enter the labor market annually, many seeking foreign employment in Gulf countries and Malaysia. Dynamic entrepreneurship creates domestic employment opportunities in IT, agribusiness, light manufacturing, and tourism, retaining skilled human capital within the country.
  • Mobilization of Domestic Capital and Idle Savings: Small ventures pool scattered domestic savings, informal family funds, and remittance inflows into productive, value-adding economic enterprises rather than speculative land real-estate purchases.
  • Import Substitution and Trade Deficit Mitigation: Nepal imports vast quantities of agricultural goods, packaged foods, textiles, and construction materials from India and China. Entrepreneurial ventures in cement production (e.g., Shivam Cement), domestic dairy, poultry, footwear (e.g., Goldstar Shoes), and noodles (e.g., Wai Wai) significantly curtail outbound foreign exchange flows.
  • Balanced Regional Industrialization: Micro, cottage, and tourism enterprises established in hilly and Himalayan districts (e.g., apple processing in Mustang, tea processing in Ilam, homestays in Gandaki) distribute wealth, curb urban rural-to-urban migration, and develop remote district infrastructure.
  • National Wealth and Tax Revenue Generation: A broadening base of registered private limited companies and proprietary enterprises boosts internal government revenue via Value Added Tax (VAT), customs duties, and Corporate Income Tax (CIT), funding public roads, schools, and hospitals.

10. Exam Preparation Guide: 2-Mark and 10-Mark Model Frameworks

2-Mark Crisp Answers

  • Q: Distinguish between technopreneurship and ecopreneurship.
    • Answer: Technopreneurship is technology-driven venture creation leveraging software, hardware, and digital innovation to capture commercial value (e.g., F1Soft in fintech), whereas ecopreneurship is environmentally conscious entrepreneurship that designs products and operational processes specifically to resolve ecological degradation and climate challenges (e.g., Doko Recyclers in waste recycling).
  • Q: State two core features of Schumpeter’s theory of entrepreneurship.
    • Answer: (1) The entrepreneur is fundamentally an innovator who introduces new production combinations, and (2) This innovation drives creative destruction, continually revolutionizing the economic structure from within by rendering old products and methods obsolete.

10-Mark Model Analytical Blueprint: Entrepreneur vs Traditional Manager

When answering a 10-mark question on comparing entrepreneurs and professional managers:

  1. Introduction & Theoretical Foundations (1.5 Marks): Define both roles clearly. Cite classical frameworks (Say, Schumpeter vs Fayol, Drucker).
  2. Tabular Comparison across Standard Dimensions (3.5 Marks): Provide an exhaustive comparison table covering minimum 7 criteria (Orientation, Risk Bearing, Decision Speed, Resource Ownership, Skillset, Compensation, Failure Response).
  3. The Organizational Transition Dynamic (2 Marks): Explain why an enterprise inevitably needs both profiles at different growth stages—how an entrepreneur creates the venture from 0 to 1, while professional managers are needed to scale the firm from 1 to 100 by instituting budgetary controls, corporate governance, and formal HR policies.
  4. Nepalese Business Context & Case Study (2 Marks): Illustrate with a concrete Nepalese case, such as the evolution of Chaudhary Group (CG) where founding entrepreneurial audacity was complemented by professional corporate executives to manage multinational operations.
  5. Critical Evaluation and Conclusion (1 Mark): Conclude with a synthesized summary of how modern economies require entrepreneurial managers who blend corporate stability with entrepreneurial agility.

Paper Khoj independent study notes — unreviewed draft, not affiliated with Tribhuvan University.