Model paper

Dean's Office Official Model Question Paper

EED 220 · Micro-finance & Cooperatives

examination paper loaded.
Programme
BBM
Academic year
Semester 6
Paper type
Official Model Question
Sitting
Dean's Office Blueprint
Full marks
60
Duration
180 minutes

Tribhuvan University

Faculty of Management

Office of the Dean

Official Model Question Paper / Dean's Office Blueprint

Course: EED 220 · Micro-finance & Cooperatives

Level: Bachelor of Business Management (BBM) · Semester 6

Full Marks: 60

Time: 3 hrs.

Candidates are required to give their answers in their own words as far as practicable. The figures in the margin indicate full marks.

Group A

Brief Answer Questions. Attempt ALL questions.

[5 × 2 = 10]
  1. Define Microfinance and state its two primary target client segments.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Answer: Microfinance: The provision of small-scale financial services—including collateral-free microloans, micro-savings, micro-insurance, and remittances—to low-income individuals, micro-entrepreneurs, and marginalized households excluded from traditional commercial banking systems. Target Clients: Rural women self-help groups and subsistence smallholder farmers.

  2. What is Joint Liability Group (JLG) lending pioneered by Grameen Bank?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Answer: Joint Liability Group (JLG): An institutional lending mechanism where a small cohort of borrowers (typically 5 members) mutually guarantee each other’s individual microloans. If one member defaults, the remaining members become collectively responsible, substituting peer group pressure and social collateral for physical assets.

  3. State the seven Rochdale Cooperative Principles in brief.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Answer:

    1. Voluntary and Open Membership
    2. Democratic Member Control (One member, one vote)
    3. Member Economic Participation
    4. Autonomy and Independence
    5. Education, Training, and Information
    6. Cooperation among Cooperatives
    7. Concern for Community
  4. Define Portfolio at Risk (PAR > 30) in microfinance institution monitoring.

    [2]
    View model solution

    Answer: \nPortfolio at Risk (PAR > 30): The proportion of an MFI’s gross loan portfolio that has one or more installment payments past due by more than 30 calendar days, expressed as a percentage:

    PAR30=Outstanding Balance of Loans with Overdue>30 DaysTotal Gross Loan Portfolio×100%PAR_{30} = \frac{\text{Outstanding Balance of Loans with Overdue} > 30 \text{ Days}}{\text{Total Gross Loan Portfolio}} \times 100\%
  5. What is the apex regulatory body for Saving and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs) in Nepal?

    [2]
    View model solution

    Answer: The Department of Cooperatives under the Ministry of Land Management, Cooperatives and Poverty Alleviation, with financial oversight coordinated alongside the Registrar and municipal local governments under the Cooperatives Act 2074.

Group B

Descriptive Answer Questions. Attempt any THREE questions.

[3 × 10 = 30]
  1. Compare and contrast Self-Help Group (SHG) Bank Linkage models with the Grameen Bank Group Model. Evaluate their impact on female economic empowerment in rural Nepal.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Microfinance Delivery Models: SHG vs. Grameen Bank

    1. Structural Comparison

    Dimension Grameen Bank Model (Class ‘D’ MFIs) Self-Help Group (SHG) Linkage Model
    Group Size 5-member peer groups forming a 30-40 member village ‘Center’. Larger affinity groups (15 to 25 members).
    Savings Mechanism Compulsory weekly center savings before and during loan disbursement. Internal savings mobilized first; members borrow from their own accumulated group corpus before seeking bank linkage.
    Lending Source Institutional MFI capital funded via commercial bank wholesale borrowings. Direct commercial bank line of credit extended to the SHG as a collective legal entity.
    Repayment Structure Strict weekly or monthly center meetings attended by MFI field loan officers. Monthly internal group meetings; peer review determines interest rates and priorities.

    2. Impact on Women’s Economic Empowerment in Nepal

    • Asset Ownership and Financial Agency: Membership enables rural women to establish independent micro-enterprises (vegetable polytunnels, poultry, goat rearing) and hold formal bank accounts.
    • Social Capital and Leadership: Weekly center meetings cultivate public speaking, civic awareness, and leadership skills, elevating women’s status in local municipal assemblies.
    • Vulnerabilities: Threat of over-indebtedness due to multiple borrowing across competing MFIs and informal moneylenders, sometimes resulting in severe household emotional distress.
  2. Examine the institutional crisis facing Saving and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs) in Nepal. Discuss the causes of liquidity runs, corporate governance failures, and policy remedies.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Institutional Crisis in Nepal’s Cooperative Sector

    1. Root Causes of Cooperative Distress

    1. Misalignment of Asset-Liability Maturities: Cooperatives mobilized short-term retail public deposits (3-12 months) and locked them into illiquid, long-term speculative real estate and land plotting assets.
    2. Gross Corporate Governance Failures and Insider Lending: Promoters and board directors funneled depositor savings into their own private shell corporations without collateral or independent credit appraisals.
    3. Fragmented Regulatory Architecture: The transition to federalism transferred regulatory jurisdiction over 30,000 cooperatives to 753 local municipalities lacking technical audit staff and financial supervisory expertise.
    4. Lack of a Safety Net: Unlike commercial banks protected by deposit insurance (up to Rs. 500,000) and NRB emergency liquidity windows, cooperatives have no institutional lender of last resort.

    2. Strategic Policy Remedies

    • Establish a specialized Second-Tier Financial Regulatory Authority (STF) equipped with legal powers to audit, seize assets, and manage distressed cooperatives.
    • Enforce strict limits on non-member business and cap individual borrower exposure at 10% of core capital.
    • Operationalize a statutory Credit Information Bureau (CIB) and Deposit and Credit Guarantee Fund for cooperatives.
  3. Discuss the financial sustainability indicators of a Microfinance Financial Institution (MFI): Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS), Financial Self-Sufficiency (FSS), and Return on Equity (ROE) with appropriate formulas.

    [10]
    View model solution

    Financial Sustainability Metrics in Microfinance

    1. Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS)

    Measures whether an MFI generates sufficient operating revenue to cover all administrative expenses, loan loss provisions, and operational financing costs without relying on ongoing donor grants:

    OSS=Financial Revenue (Interest + Fees)Financial Expense+Net Loan Loss Provision+Operating / Administrative Expense×100%OSS = \frac{\text{Financial Revenue (Interest + Fees)}}{\text{Financial Expense} + \text{Net Loan Loss Provision} + \text{Operating / Administrative Expense}} \times 100\%

    • Benchmark: OSS100%OSS \ge 100\% indicates the MFI covers daily operational outlays from client revenues.

    2. Financial Self-Sufficiency (FSS)

    An unsubsidized sustainability measure that adjusts accounting expenses for inflation, subsidized cost of funds, and in-kind donor grants:

    FSS=Adjusted Operating RevenueAdjusted Total Operating, Financial, and Imputed Capital Costs×100%FSS = \frac{\text{Adjusted Operating Revenue}}{\text{Adjusted Total Operating, Financial, and Imputed Capital Costs}} \times 100\%

    • Benchmark: FSS110%FSS \ge 110\% demonstrates true commercial viability and self-sustaining growth capability.

    3. Return on Equity (ROE)

    Measures the net profitability generated on shareholders’ invested equity capital:

    ROE=Net Income After TaxAverage Shareholder Equity×100%ROE = \frac{\text{Net Income After Tax}}{\text{Average Shareholder Equity}} \times 100\%

  4. Explain the PEARLS Financial Performance Monitoring System developed by the World Council of Credit Unions (WOCCU) for credit cooperatives.

    [10]
    View model solution

    The PEARLS Financial Monitoring Framework

    PEARLS is a standardized quantitative management tool designed by WOCCU to evaluate cooperative safety and sound financial management across six disciplines:

    1. P - Protection: Adequacy of loan loss provisions against delinquent loans. Standard mandates 100% provisioning for loans delinquent > 12 months, and 35% for loans delinquent 1-12 months.
    2. E - Effective Financial Structure: Measures the composition of assets, liabilities, and equity (e.g., Net Loan Portfolio should ideally constitute 70-80% of total assets; Savings Deposits should fund 70-80% of assets).
    3. A - Asset Quality: Minimizes non-earning assets and delinquent loans. Mandates Non-Performing Loans (NPL) < 5% of total loan portfolio.
    4. R - Rates of Return and Costs: Assesses yield on loans, cost of savings deposits, and operating expense ratios to ensure positive real returns for savers.
    5. L - Liquidity: Maintains adequate cash and short-term liquid reserves (minimum 10-15% of total withdrawable member deposits) to meet unexpected member cash withdrawals.
    6. S - Signs of Growth: Tracks percentage annual growth in membership, total assets, and institutional capital reserves to sustain long-term resilience.

Group C

Comprehensive Answer / Case Analysis Question. Attempt ALL questions.

[1 × 20 = 20]
  1. Microfinance Case Study: Over-Indebtedness, Multiple Borrowing, and Credit Bureau Integration in Rural Chitwan

    ‘Unnati Microfinance Bittiya Sanstha Ltd.’ is a licensed Class ‘D’ microfinance bank operating 45 branch offices across Gandaki and Bagmati provinces, serving 65,000 rural women clients:

    • The Delinquency Shock: In fiscal year 2080, Unnati’s 30-day Portfolio at Risk (PAR > 30) surged from 2.1% to 14.8%, while loan collection efficiency dropped to 81%.
    • Field Audit Findings:
      • An internal credit investigation revealed that over 52% of delinquent clients had active microloans from between three and seven different MFIs, cooperatives, and non-bank lenders simultaneously.
      • Borrowers engaged in ‘loan layering’—taking a fresh microloan from MFI B to pay the maturing weekly installment of MFI A.
      • When regional agricultural crop prices plummeted following hail storms and the informal cross-border market contracted, the Ponzi-like debt cycle collapsed.
      • Informal political agitation groups incited rural clients to refuse repayments, staging demonstrations outside branch offices and threatening field credit officers.

    Questions: a) Diagnose the systemic root causes of the over-indebtedness crisis and delinquency surge at Unnati Microfinance. (6 Marks) b) Evaluate the operational and credit risk failures of MFI field loan officers in conducting customer cash-flow assessments and credit verification. (7 Marks) c) Design an institutional turnaround plan incorporating Nepal Rastra Bank’s unified microfinance directives, centralized Credit Information Bureau (CIB) checks, debt restructuring, and client protection principles. (7 Marks)

    [20]
    View model solution

    Comprehensive Case Analysis: Unnati Microfinance Bittiya Sanstha

    a) Diagnosis of the Systemic Over-Indebtedness Crisis

    1. Aggressive Disconnected Expansion: Multiple MFIs expanded into the same village centers, competing aggressively on loan disbursement targets rather than client productive absorption capacity.
    2. Absence of Real-Time Information Sharing: Lack of automated cross-institutional credit reporting allowed borrowers to borrow from multiple institutions simultaneously.
    3. Loan Layering (Debt Spiral): Clients used expensive credit to repay existing debt without generating incremental business cash flow.
    4. Vulnerability to Exogenous Shocks: Subsistence farm households lacking weather-indexed crop insurance face immediate default upon harvest failure.

    b) Operational and Underwriting Failures

    1. Shallow Household Cash-Flow Appraisal: Loan officers prioritized quick disbursement to meet monthly targets, accepting verbal estimates of livestock income without conducting stress-tested household cash flow audits.
    2. Erosion of Social Collateral: As group centers grew larger and members took multiple loans across rival institutions, peer pressure and collective responsibility broke down. Members refused to cover defaults for peers who had borrowed recklessly elsewhere.
    3. Failure of KYC and Field Verification: Loan officers failed to verify client citizenship and PAN records against other local MFI rosters.

    c) Institutional Turnaround and Rehabilitation Strategy

    1. Enforce NRB Microfinance Directives and Strict CIB Integration:
      • Mandate that no client may borrow from more than one microfinance bank (as per amended NRB directives).
      • Require mandatory real-time Credit Information Bureau (CIB) credit report generation prior to approving any loan. Cap total unsecured microloan exposure at Rs. 500,000 per borrower.
    2. Pragmatic Debt Restructuring and Tenor Extension:
      • Segregate delinquent clients into:
        • Willful Defaulters: Initiate legal recovery against guarantors.
        • Distressed Borrowers: Offer an extended loan rescheduling agreement: waive penalty interest, extend repayment tenure by 12-24 months, and restructure installments to align with crop harvest cycles.
    3. Depoliticization and Community Engagement:
      • Engage with local municipal ward chairs and community elders to counteract misinformation, re-establishing that microfinance institutions are regulated banking entities and loan repayment is a legally binding obligation.
    4. Institutionalizing Smart Campaign Client Protection Principles:
      • Train field officers in non-coercive debt collection practices, financial literacy counseling, and mandatory micro-insurance coverage for livestock and crops.