Tribhuvan University
Faculty of Management
Office of the Dean
Official Model Question Paper / Dean's Office Blueprint
Candidates are required to give their answers in their own words as far as practicable. The figures in the margin indicate full marks.
Group A
Brief Answer Questions. Attempt ALL questions.
[5 × 2 = 10]- [2]
Define Management and state the four core managerial functions.
View model solution
Answer: Management: The process of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling human, financial, physical, and information resources to achieve organizational goals effectively and efficiently. Four Core Functions:
- Planning
- Organizing
- Leading (Directing)
- Controlling
- [2]
Distinguish between Effectiveness and Efficiency.
View model solution
Answer:
- Efficiency (Doing things right): Achieving the maximum output with the minimum input of resources; minimizing cost, waste, and time.
- Effectiveness (Doing the right things): Choosing appropriate organizational goals and successfully attaining them.
- [2]
State the core thesis of Fred Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership.
View model solution
Answer: Fiedler’s Contingency Model posits that effective group performance depends upon the proper match between a leader’s style of interacting with subordinates (task-oriented vs relationship-oriented, measured by LPC) and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader (Leader-Member Relations, Task Structure, Position Power).
- [2]
What is Span of Control? Differentiate between a Tall and Flat organizational structure.
View model solution
Answer: Span of Control: The number of subordinates a manager can supervise directly, efficiently, and effectively.
- Tall Structure: Narrow span of control with many hierarchical management levels and close supervision.
- Flat Structure: Wide span of control with few hierarchical levels, promoting decentralized autonomy.
- [2]
Define Benchmarking in managerial control.
View model solution
Answer: Benchmarking: The continuous process of measuring a company’s products, services, processes, and practices against the toughest competitors or industry leaders recognized as world-class, to identify performance gaps and implement best practices.
Group B
Descriptive Answer Questions. Attempt any THREE questions.
[3 × 10 = 30]- [10]
Compare and contrast Classical Management Theories (Taylor’s Scientific Management and Fayol’s Administrative Theory) with the Human Relations Movement (Hawthorne Studies).
View model solution
1. Conceptual Evolution of Management Thought
Evolution of Management Thought | +----------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | | Classical Approach (Late 1800s–1920s) Behavioral Approach (1930s–1950s) - Focus: Machine, formal rules, task efficiency - Focus: Human psychology, informal groups, - Pioneers: Taylor, Fayol, Weber social needs (Hawthorne Studies) - View: Economic man ("Cog in machine") - View: Social man ("Emotional & social entity")
2. Comparative Analysis
Feature Taylor’s Scientific Management Fayol’s Administrative Principles Human Relations Movement Primary Focus Shop floor, physical tasks, worker motions. Top-level administration, corporate coordination. Psychological well-being, informal group dynamics. Core Method Time and motion studies, piece-rate incentives. 14 Universal management principles. Participative leadership, employee recognition. Worker Motivation Purely monetary (Economic Man). Hierarchical discipline, equity, remuneration. Social belonging, informal group norms, empathy. Legacy Contribution Standardized work, industrial assembly lines. Functions of management (POC³), line of authority. Organizational behavior, modern HRM, participatory leadership. - [10]
What is Organizational Structure? Explain the features, merits, and limitations of a Matrix Organization Structure.
View model solution
1. Concept of Matrix Structure
A Matrix Structure is an organizational design that combines two distinct forms of departmentalization simultaneously: Functional and Product/Project. It violates the classical unity of command principle by assigning employees to two bosses (a functional manager and a project/product manager).
CEO | +-------------------+-------------------+ | | | VP Marketing VP Engineering VP Finance | | | Project A Manager ---> Employee X (reports to Project A & Engineering) | | | Project B Manager ---> Employee Y (reports to Project B & Marketing)
2. Merits and Limitations of Matrix Structure
Category Key Factors Merits - Flexible Resource Sharing: Specialists can be allocated dynamically to priority projects without permanent restructuring.<br>- Enhanced Inter-Disciplinary Communication: Breaks functional silos and fosters cross-functional innovation.<br>- Accelerated Professional Growth: Exposes employees to diverse project challenges and corporate mentors. Limitations - Role Conflict & Dual Command: Employees caught between conflicting instructions from two supervisors ("two-boss problem").<br>- Heightened Stress & Power Struggles: Friction between functional heads and project managers over resource allocation.<br>- Excessive Overhead Costs: More administrative meetings and coordination overheads. - [10]
Examine the Control Process. Differentiate between Feedforward, Concurrent, and Feedback Control with business examples.
View model solution
1. The 4-Step Managerial Control Process
[ Establish Standards ] -> [ Measure Actual Performance ] -> [ Compare Against Standards ] | v [ Take Corrective Action ] <---------------------------------------------+
2. Three Types of Control by Timing
Control Type Timing of Execution Focus & Purpose Real-World Example Feedforward Control (Preventive) Implemented before an activity begins. Anticipates problems; screens inputs to prevent errors. Inspecting incoming raw materials, pre-employment drug screening, pilot flight pre-checks. Concurrent Control (Real-Time) Implemented while an activity is taking place. Corrects problems in real-time before costs escalate. Direct supervisor walk-arounds, real-time computerized server performance dashboards. Feedback Control (Post-Action) Implemented after an activity has finished. Evaluates end results to inform future planning. Annual financial audits, customer satisfaction surveys, variance analysis of budget. - [10]
Analyze Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation. Distinguish between Hygiene factors and Motivators and explain their managerial implications.
View model solution
1. Conceptual Premise of Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory
Frederick Herzberg proposed that the factors leading to job satisfaction are separate and distinct from the factors that lead to job dissatisfaction.
Dissatisfaction ------------------- No Dissatisfaction ------------------- Satisfaction <--- Hygiene Factors (Extrinsic) ---> <--- Motivators (Intrinsic) --->
2. Hygiene Factors vs. Motivators
Category Intrinsic / Extrinsic Specific Factors Impact on Motivation Hygiene Factors (Maintenance) Extrinsic (Job Context) Company policies, working conditions, salary, job security, interpersonal relations with boss. When absent, cause severe dissatisfaction. When present in abundance, they prevent dissatisfaction but do not generate genuine motivation. Motivators (Growth Factors) Intrinsic (Job Content) Sense of achievement, recognition, challenging work, responsibility, advancement, personal growth. When present, cultivate deep satisfaction and high performance. When absent, employees experience neutral satisfaction.
3. Managerial Implications
- Myth of Salary as Motivator: Raising pay or improving office amenities merely pacifies dissatisfied employees; it does not inspire discretionary excellence.
- Job Enrichment: Managers must enrich jobs by granting greater autonomy, assigning meaningful responsibility, and recognizing outstanding performance.
Group C
Comprehensive Answer / Case Analysis Question.
[1 × 20 = 20]- [20]
Read the leadership case study and answer all questions:
Case Scenario: Himalayan Craft Exports (HCE) Himalayan Craft Exports (HCE) is a family-owned trading house in Kathmandu exporting handmade copper utensils and pashmina shawls. The founder, Mr. Pradhan (age 68), founded the enterprise 35 years ago and continues to practice an extreme Autocratic Management Style:
- All decisions—including purchasing office stationery, hiring junior clerks, and approving minor discount invoices—require his personal physical signature.
- Middle managers are reprimanded publicly for taking initiative without prior approval.
- Communication flows exclusively downward; employees are expected to follow orders without questioning.
Recently, Mr. Pradhan’s son, Rohan, who earned an MBA abroad, joined as Chief Operating Officer (COO). Rohan observed alarming organizational symptoms:
- High employee turnover among talented young software and marketing professionals (over 38% annually).
- Paralysis in operational decision-making whenever Mr. Pradhan is traveling abroad or attending family events.
- Employee apathy and a pervasive "blame culture" where staff hide operational errors to avoid public scolding.
Rohan wants to transition HCE into a Participative, Decentralized Organization implementing Peter Drucker’s Management by Objectives (MBO) and modern team-based leadership. However, Mr. Pradhan resists, claiming: "Employees in Nepal lack discipline; if I loosen control, the business will collapse."
Required: (a) Critically evaluate the strengths and severe dysfunctions of Mr. Pradhan’s autocratic management style. (6 Marks) (b) How can Rohan persuade his father to delegate authority? Explain the concept of Effective Delegation and its three essential elements (Authority, Responsibility, Accountability). (7 Marks) (c) Develop an actionable step-by-step Change Management Plan to transition HCE to a participatory, empowering organizational culture without triggering destructive family conflict. (7 Marks)
View model solution
Case Solution: Himalayan Craft Exports (HCE)
Part (a): Evaluation of Autocratic Management Style (6 Marks)
- Temporary Strengths: Rapid decision-making when the founder is present; absolute centralized vision; tight control over cash expenditures.
- Severe Dysfunctions at HCE:
- Founder Bottleneck: Operations grind to a complete halt whenever Mr. Pradhan is absent, creating severe export shipment delays.
- Talent Attrition & Demotivation: Qualified professionals refuse to be treated as passive order-takers, resulting in an unsustainable 38% annual employee turnover.
- Culture of Fear & Deception: Fear of public reprimand induces staff to conceal mistakes, preventing constructive organizational learning.
- Lack of Innovation: Extreme centralization stifles employee initiative and creative problem solving.
Part (b): Effective Delegation Framework (7 Marks)
Rohan can persuade his father by illustrating that delegation does not mean losing control; rather, it enables the founder to focus on high-value strategic growth while developing successor leadership.
The Delegation Triad | +--------------------------+--------------------------+ | | | Authority Responsibility Accountability (Right to decide & act) (Obligation to perform) (Answerability for results)- Authority: Granting managers the formal legitimate power and budget to make decisions within pre-agreed limits (e.g., approving invoices up to Rs. 50,000).
- Responsibility: Assigning clear tasks and measurable operational targets to subordinates.
- Accountability: Holding managers strictly answerable to executive leadership for final performance outcomes.
Part (c): Actionable Change Management Plan (7 Marks)
Phase 1: Pilot Delegation & Management by Objectives (MBO) (Months 1–3)
- Introduce MBO in one non-critical department (e.g., digital marketing). Jointly establish verifiable quarterly targets (e.g., expanding online export leads by 20%).
- Establish transparent financial sign-off thresholds: Managers can approve standard operational invoices up to Rs. 30,000, reducing the founder’s daily paperwork burden by 70%.
Phase 2: Communication Restructuring & Feedback Loops (Months 4–6)
- Institute weekly cross-functional team meetings where department heads present performance dashboards and proposed solutions.
- Train Mr. Pradhan to adopt private constructive coaching rather than public reprimands, rebuilding psychological safety.
Phase 3: Transition to Transformational Leadership (Months 7–12)
- Reorganize export operations into customer-centric project teams with performance-based bonuses tied to client satisfaction and zero-defect delivery.
- Elevate Mr. Pradhan to the role of Chairman & Strategic Advisor, focusing on high-level buyer relationships and strategic artisan procurement, while Rohan executes day-to-day operations as managing COO.