MGT 238

Practicum on Business Plan

TU BBA · Semester 6 · BBA curriculum effective from 2021

Requirement
practical
Credits
3
Study Guide
7 units available

Chapter notes

Authoritative study guide across 7 syllabus units

Open a unit to read its study notes.

Unit 1: Introduction and Application of Business Model with Business Plan· 2 LHs· ~6 marks

Difficulty: ★★★ | High-yield focus: Learn the difference between a business model and a business plan, and master idea generation and selection criteria. Key exam mastery: Construct an end-to-end venture roadmap and assemble the foundational executive framework for a student business plan.

Part 1: Core Concepts (2 Marks)

  • Business Plan Practicum: An applied, project-based laboratory course where students transition from theoretical management concepts to assembling, drafting, defending, and pitching a viable commercial business venture.
  • Business Model: The conceptual architecture explaining how an enterprise creates, delivers, and captures economic and social value. ★
  • Business Plan: A comprehensive, formal written document serving as an operational execution roadmap and financial pitch deck for launching a commercial startup. ★
  • Brainstorming: A creative group ideation technique designed to generate a large volume of ideas while deliberately deferring judgment and criticism.
  • Idea Selection Matrix: A multi-criteria evaluation tool used by venture teams to rank ideas based on market size, technical feasibility, founder capability, and competitive defensibility.

Practical Frameworks & Workshop Protocols

1. The Practicum Journey Architecture

Students execute their venture creation journey through a structured sequential pipeline:

End-to-End Business Plan Practicum Pipeline (MGT 238)
End-to-End Business Plan Practicum Pipeline (MGT 238)
  • Session 1: Idea generation, brainstorming, venture screening, and foundational business model architecture.
  • Session 2: Market feasibility, industry analysis, and SWOT formulation.
  • Session 3: Buyer persona profiling, customer journey mapping, and competitor benchmarking.
  • Session 4: Financial pro forma statements, cash flow modeling, and break-even calculations.
  • Session 6: Pitch deck design, executive verbal delivery, and peer critique.
  • Session 7: Final formal presentation before a faculty jury and venture capital panelists.

2. Ideation & Selection Methodology

  1. Divergent Ideation: Teams brainstorm at least 25 raw pain points observed in daily Nepalese life (e.g., agricultural supply wastage, traffic management, medical report fragmentation).
  2. Convergent Screening Matrix:
    • Filter 1: Market Demand (Is there a validated willingness to pay?).
    • Filter 2: Technical & Operational Feasibility (Can a student team build the prototype within 12 weeks?).
    • Filter 3: Regulatory & Capital Hurdles (Does the idea require billions in capital or inaccessible legal licenses?).
  3. Selection: Select the single highest-scoring venture to develop throughout the semester.

Toolkits & Templates

Evaluation Parameter Business Model Canvas Formal Business Plan Document
Document Length 1 visual single-page canvas 25 to 40 page comprehensive formal document
Primary Audience Internal founding team and agile advisors Commercial loan officers, institutional investors, grant committees
Pacing / Agility Dynamic; updated weekly based on customer feedback Structured; detailed operational and financial forecasts
Core Utility Hypotheses generation and rapid pivoting Operational execution roadmap and legal funding due diligence

Practical Exercises & Common Mistakes

Practicum Group Exercise: Analyze the entrepreneurial journey of a prominent Nepalese startup (e.g., Pathao Nepal or Foodmandu). Map out their initial founding hurdles, their early business model, and how they adapted to local cash-on-delivery and traffic realities.

Students lose marks here because they select highly generic, impractical multinational concepts (e.g., building a social media app to replace Facebook) rather than identifying specific, solvable local consumer pain points in Nepal with realistic operational boundaries.