Legal Environment for Business in Nepal

Essential Elements of a Valid Contract (Nepal National Civil Code, 2074):

Under the National Civil Code, 2074 (Section 504), a legally binding contract requires:

1. Plurality of Parties & Legal Capacity: Two or more competent persons of sound mind who have attained the age of majority (18 years).
2. Offer and Unconditional Acceptance: A definite proposal followed by an absolute and unqualified assent (Consensus ad idem).
3. Free Consent: Consent given voluntarily, free from coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mutual mistake.
4. Lawful Object & Lawful Consideration: The agreement must pursue a legal purpose and be supported by valid consideration that is not contrary to public policy.
5. Intention to Create Legal Relations: The parties must intend to establish legally enforceable rights and obligations.

Meaning of a Person of Unsound Mind:

Under the law of contract (Section 507 of the National Civil Code, 2074), a person is considered to be of unsound mind if, at the time of entering into the contract, they are incapable of understanding the terms and conditions of the transaction or of forming a rational judgment regarding its effect upon their personal or financial interests.

Categories:

• Idiots / Congenital Disability: Persons permanently lacking cognitive reasoning capacity from birth.
• Lunatics / Temporarily Insane: Persons suffering from mental disorders who may have lucid intervals (contracts made during a lucid interval are legally valid).
• Intoxicated or Delirious Persons: Persons whose rational judgment is temporarily incapacitated by narcotics, severe alcohol intoxication, or high fever.

Importance of Free Consent:

Free consent is the foundational cornerstone of the law of contract based on the legal maxim Consensus ad idem (meeting of the minds on the same thing in the same sense).

Why it is Crucial:

1. Ensures Voluntariness and Fairness: Validates that both parties voluntarily agreed without external duress, pressure, or deceit.
2. Determines Contract Enforceability: If consent is caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the aggrieved party under Section 516 of the National Civil Code, 2074. If caused by mutual bilateral mistake of essential fact, it is void ab initio.

Communication of Offer:

Communication of an offer is the legal process by which a proposer (offeror) transmits the terms of a proposal to the offeree, bringing it to the offeree’s actual knowledge.

Legal Rule (Section 505, National Civil Code, 2074):

• The communication of an offer is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made.
• An individual cannot accept an offer of which they had no prior knowledge (Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt principle).

Definition and Meaning of Prospectus:

Under Section 2(n) and Section 23 of the Nepal Companies Act, 2063, a prospectus is an official legal disclosure document issued by a public limited company inviting the general public to subscribe to or purchase its shares, debentures, or debt securities.

Core Functions:

• Discloses the company’s financial health, past performance, board of directors’ profiles, capital structure, and risk factors.
• Serves as the formal basis on which public investors evaluate whether to invest capital in an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

Types of Breach of Contract:

1. Actual Breach of Contract: Occurs when a contracting party fails or refuses to perform their contractual obligation at the agreed time or during the course of performance.
2. Anticipatory Breach of Contract: Occurs when a contracting party declares their intention not to perform the contract before the agreed date of performance arrives:
   • Express Repudiation: Communicating explicit refusal via words or writing.
   • Implied Impossibility: Performing an act that disables oneself from fulfilling the promise (e.g., selling a contracted unique property to a third party before closing).

Modes of Termination / Discharge of a Contract:

Under the National Civil Code, 2074, a contract is discharged through:

1. Performance: Actual performance or valid tender of performance by both parties.
2. Mutual Consent / Agreement: Novation, alteration, rescission, remission, or waiver.
3. Supervening Impossibility (Doctrine of Frustration): Subsequent change of law or destruction of subject matter.
4. Operation of Law: Insolvency, death, or merger of rights.
5. Lapse of Time: Failure to enforce legal remedies within statutory limitation periods.
6. Breach of Contract: Repudiation or non-performance by either party.

Nature of Performance of Contract:

1. Actual Performance: Both parties completely and punctually fulfill their respective reciprocal promises exactly according to the contractual terms, extinguishing all obligations.
2. Attempted Performance (Tender of Performance): The promisor makes a valid and unconditional offer to perform at the proper time and place, but the promisee refuses to accept it. Tender of performance discharges the promisor from liability for non-performance.

Rules Regarding Contingent Contracts (Nepal National Civil Code, 2074):

A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something if some collateral event does or does not happen (Section 510).

Key Legal Rules of Enforcement:

1. Contracts Contingent on the Happening of an Event:
   • Cannot be enforced by law unless and until that uncertain future event has actually occurred. If the event becomes impossible, the contract becomes void.
2. Contracts Contingent on the Non-Happening of an Event:
   • Can be enforced when the happening of that event becomes completely impossible, and not before.
3. Contracts Contingent on an Event Happening Within a Fixed Time:
   • Becomes void if, at the expiration of the fixed time, the event has not occurred, or if before the time expires, it becomes certain that the event will not happen.
4. Contracts Contingent on the Future Conduct of a Living Person:
   • If the event is how a person will act at an unspecified time, the event is deemed impossible if that person acts in a manner making it impossible for them so to act within any definite time.
5. Contracts Contingent on Impossible Events are Void Ab Initio:
   • Contingent agreements dependent on inherently impossible events (e.g., bringing a dead person to life) are void from inception, whether the impossibility was known to the parties or not.

Concept and Types of Quasi-Contract:

1. Conceptual Foundation

A quasi-contract (or constructive contract) is not a genuine contract created by formal agreement or mutual consent of parties. Instead, it is a legal obligation imposed by equity and justice under the fundamental doctrine of Unjust Enrichment (Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena jactura—no person should unjustly enrich themselves at another person’s expense).

---

2. Major Types of Quasi-Contracts under Nepalese Law:

1. Supply of Necessaries to Incapable Persons (Section 656, Civil Code):
   • If a person incapable of entering into a contract (e.g., minor, person of unsound mind) is supplied with necessaries suited to their condition in life, the supplier is entitled to reimbursement from the property of such incapable person.
2. Reimbursement of Person Paying Money on Behalf of Another:
   • A person interested in the payment of money which another is bound by law to pay, and who pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed (e.g., a sub-tenant paying municipal tax to avoid property seizure).
3. Obligation of Person Enjoying Benefit of Non-Gratuitous Act:
   • Where a person lawfully performs something for another person or delivers goods, not intending to do so gratuitously, and the other person enjoys the benefit, the beneficiary must compensate the provider.
4. Responsibility of Finder of Lost Goods:
   • A person who finds goods belonging to another and takes custody incurs the identical legal duties and bailee obligations as a bailee (must take reasonable care and make diligent search for the true owner).
5. Liability of Person Receiving Money by Mistake or Under Coercion:
   • A person to whom money has been paid or anything delivered erroneously by mistake or through coercion must repay or return it.

Legal Opinion: Contract Validity in Shambhu vs. Harihar (Export of Rakta Chandan):

1. Facts of the Case:

• Shambhu contracted with Harihar to supply and export “Rakta Chandan” (Red Sandalwood) to the United States of America at a stipulated rate.
• Subsequent to contract formation, the Government of Nepal enacted a statutory law strictly prohibiting the export of Rakta Chandan by private individuals, reserving export exclusively to the State.

---

2. Relevant Legal Provisions:

• National Civil Code, 2074 (Section 531): Governs the Doctrine of Supervening Impossibility / Frustration of Contract.
• Under contract law, where performance of a contract becomes unlawful or physically impossible due to subsequent legislative enactments or government prohibition beyond the control of parties, the contract becomes discharged and void.

---

3. Legal Analysis:

1. Initial Validity: At the time of agreement, the contract was valid if permitted under prevailing trade regulations.
2. Subsequent Illegality: The subsequent enactment of the prohibitive law made private commercial export illegal under Nepalese law. Under the doctrine of frustration (Taylor v. Caldwell and Section 531), subsequent change of law destroys the legal foundation of the agreement.
3. No Party in Breach: Because non-performance is caused by sovereign legislative decree rather than voluntary default, neither party can sue the other for breach of contract or claim commercial damages.

---

4. Conclusion & Legal Advice:

• The contract is VOID due to supervening illegality.
• Shambhu is legally excused from supplying the timber to Harihar.
• If Shambhu received any advance monetary deposit from Harihar, he must restore and refund it under Section 532 (Doctrine of Restitution).

Legal Analysis: Enforceability of Agreement to Commit a Crime (Sarala and Gita):

1. Facts of the Case:

• Sarala promised to pay a sum of money to Gita on the condition that Gita kills Rita.
• Gita accepts the agreement, commits the homicide (murder), and demands payment.
• Sarala refuses to pay the promised sum.
• Issue: Can Gita legally recover the promised money through court action?

---

2. Relevant Legal Provisions:

• National Civil Code, 2074 (Section 517):
  • An agreement is void ab initio (void from the very beginning) if its object or consideration is unlawful, prohibited by criminal law, injurious to the person or property of another, or contrary to public policy and morality.
• Fundamental Legal Maxims:
  • Ex turpi causa non oritur actio: No legal action arises from an immoral or illegal cause.
  • In pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis: Where both parties are equally at fault, the position of the defendant is stronger.

---

3. Legal Analysis:

1. Contract is Non-Existent in Law: The agreement involves contracting for murder, a heinous felony under the National Penal Code, 2074. The consideration and object are blatantly criminal.
2. Absolute Denial of Judicial Remedy: Courts of law exist to uphold justice and will never enforce agreements that facilitate criminal acts.
3. Criminal Culpability: Rather than obtaining civil payment, both parties face severe criminal sanctions. Gita is liable for murder, and Sarala is liable for criminal conspiracy and abetment to murder.

---

4. Conclusion:

No, Gita CANNOT recover any amount from Sarala through legal remedies. The contract is completely void ab initio, and both parties are subject to criminal prosecution under the National Penal Code, 2074.

Judicial Decision: Partial Delivery of Goods (Prakash vs. Mohan):

1. Facts of the Case:

• Prakash agreed to supply a specified total quantity of sugar to Mohan.
• Contract condition: Payment was agreed to be made only after completing full supply.
• Prakash supplied only a portion of the contracted sugar and failed to deliver the remaining balance.
• Issue: What is the fair and lawful resolution between Prakash and Mohan?

---

2. Relevant Legal Provisions:

• National Civil Code, 2074 (Sections on Sale of Goods and Performance of Contract):
  • Entire Contract Doctrine: Where a contract is indivisible and provides for payment only upon complete execution, the promisor cannot demand payment without full performance.
  • Doctrine of Quantum Meruit (As much as earned): Where a party receives and retains the benefit of partial performance under a contract, equity mandates that the party enjoying the benefit must pay for what was actually retained.
  • Damages for Breach (Section 534): The innocent party is entitled to recover damages for losses caused by the supplier’s default.

---

3. Legal Judgment & Resolution:

1. Option A: If Mohan Rejects and Returns the Partial Delivery:
   • Mohan is completely within his legal rights to reject the partial delivery because Prakash failed to fulfill the entire condition precedent. In this case, Mohan pays nothing and can sue Prakash for commercial damages (e.g., price difference of procuring sugar from the open market).
2. Option B: If Mohan Accepts and Retains the Delivered Sugar:
   • If Mohan decides to retain and use/resell the partially delivered sugar, he is legally obligated under Quantum Meruit to pay Prakash for the quantity actually retained, calculated at the agreed contract rate.
3. Deduction of Compensatory Damages:
   • From the amount owed to Prakash for the retained sugar, Mohan has the legal right to deduct and set-off any financial damages incurred to procure the deficit quantity of sugar at higher market prices.

---

4. Conclusion:

Justice mandates that if Mohan retains the partially delivered sugar, he must pay Prakash the pro-rata value of that sugar, minus any actual financial losses caused by Prakash’s breach. If Mohan rejects the partial supply, he owes nothing and is entitled to compensation.