INS 202

Principles and Practice of Life Insurance

TU BBA-F · Semester 8 · BBA-F curriculum (2021 Common Core)

Requirement
elective
Credits
3
Study Guide
7 units available

Chapter notes

Authoritative study guide across 7 syllabus units

Open a unit to read its study notes.

Unit 1: Introduction to Life Insurance· 6 LHs· ~8 marks

Introduction to Life Insurance

Conceptual Foundations and Economic Role of Life Insurance

Human Life Value (HLV - Solomon Huebner)

The capitalized present value of that portion of a breadwinner’s expected future earnings that will be dedicated to their family and dependents over their remaining working lifetime:

HLV=∑t=1nEt−Tt−Ct(1+r)t\text{HLV} = \sum_{t=1}^n \frac{E_t - T_t - C_t}{(1 + r)^t}
Where EtE_t is annual earnings, TtT_t is taxes, and CtC_t is personal consumption.

The Needs Approach

A financial planning methodology that analyzes the specific monetary obligations that must be met if a breadwinner dies: (1) Cash cleanup needs (funeral, debt), (2) Readjustment income, (3) Dependency income, (4) Education and mortgage funds.

Income Tax Deduction for Life Insurance in Nepal

Under the Nepal Income Tax Act 2058 (Schedule 1), individuals can deduct life insurance premiums paid up to a maximum statutory threshold of Rs. 40,000 per annum from their taxable income.

Human Life Value and Needs Approach to Capital Sizing

Economic Impact of Premature Death across Family Types

  1. Single Individual (No Dependents): Minimal need for life insurance (only burial/clean-up debt).
  2. Single-Parent Family: Highest, most urgent need for life insurance to secure minor children’s survival.
  3. Two-Income Family with Children: Both earners require substantial life insurance to maintain current living standards.
  4. Sandwich Generation Family: Breadwinner supporting both minor children and elderly aging parents requires maximum protection.

Comparative Life Capital Models: Human Life Value vs Needs-Based Analysis

Assessment Method Human Life Value (HLV) Approach Needs Approach
Philosophical Basis Measures the economic earning power of life Measures the specific financial liabilities of survivors
Calculation Variable Net present value of personal future income Sum of debts, education funds & living income needs
Suitability Ideal for young professionals with rising earnings Ideal for tailored financial planning with multiple goals

Human Life Value Mathematical Capital Sizing and Premium Calculation

Applied Problem: Human Life Value (HLV) Calculation

A 35-year-old corporate manager in Kathmandu plans to retire at age 60 (25 working years remaining):

  • Current Annual Gross Salary: Rs. 1,500,000
  • Annual Income Taxes: Rs. 200,000
  • Personal Self-Maintenance Consumption: Rs. 300,000
  • Remaining annual income dedicated to family: Rs. 1,000,000
  • Appropriate discount rate: 8.0%8.0\% PVIFA8%,25=10.6748\text{PVIFA}_{8\%, 25} = 10.6748.
  1. Compute the manager’s Human Life Value (HLV).
  2. Calculate the annual tax savings if he pays an annual life insurance premium of Rs. 40,000 (Marginal tax bracket =30%= 30\%).

Solution:

  1. Human Life Value (HLV):
    Net Annual Contribution to Family=1,500,000−200,000−300,000=Rs. 1,000,000\text{Net Annual Contribution to Family} = 1,500,000 - 200,000 - 300,000 = \text{Rs. } 1,000,000
    HLV=Annual Contribution×PVIFA8%,25=1,000,000×10.6748=Rs. 10,674,800\text{HLV} = \text{Annual Contribution} \times \text{PVIFA}_{8\%, 25} = 1,000,000 \times 10.6748 = \text{Rs. } 10,674,800
    The family requires a life insurance policy of approximately Rs. 10.67 Million to replace his economic value.
  2. Annual Tax Savings:
    Tax Rebate=Qualifying Premium×Marginal Tax Rate=40,000×0.30=Rs. 12,000\text{Tax Rebate} = \text{Qualifying Premium} \times \text{Marginal Tax Rate} = 40,000 \times 0.30 = \text{Rs. } 12,000

Key analytical nuance: they include the deceased breadwinner’s personal consumption in the family income replacement pool when calculating HLV.

Financial Planning Principles: Human Life Value vs. Needs Approach

In life insurance planning, estimating adequate death benefit protection relies on two classical models:

  1. Human Life Value (HLV) Approach (Solomon Huebner): Quantifies the present value of the breadwinner’s future earnings dedicated to family support:
    HLV=∑t=1nEt−Tt−Ct(1+r)t\text{HLV} = \sum_{t=1}^n \frac{E_t - T_t - C_t}{(1 + r)^t}
    Where EtE_t is expected gross annual earnings, TtT_t is taxes, CtC_t is personal living expenses, and rr is the discount rate over remaining working life (nn).
  2. Needs Approach: Quantifies specific lump-sum cash needs (funeral expenses, unpaid mortgage, debt payoff) plus ongoing family income needs (dependency period income, education fund, emergency reserve).