English - II 2024 Board Question Paper

Why Indians Call Paper Bills “Green Frog Skins” (The Green Frog Skin)

In John Fire Lame Deer’s autobiographical essay The Green Frog Skin, the Lakota holy man explains that Native Americans call dollar bills “green frog skins” as a biting satirical critique of the white man’s irrational obsession with money:

• Like the dried, crinkled skin of a dead green frog, paper money has no intrinsic nutritional, spiritual, or practical value—you cannot eat it, wear it, or use it to nourish the soul.
• Yet, white capitalist society treats this useless green paper as a sacred idol, frantically hoarding it, destroying sacred Black Hills mountains, poisoning rivers, and killing fellow human beings just to accumulate more “frog skins.” By using this metaphor, Lame Deer exposes the artificiality and spiritual emptiness of materialistic greed.

The Main Purpose of Art

In cultural and academic discourse (Oxford EAP Unit 9: Art and Design), the main purpose of art encompasses several vital functions:

1. Aesthetic Transcendence and Emotional Expression: Art allows human beings to express, process, and evoke complex emotions, beauty, and philosophical truths that transcend everyday pragmatic speech.
2. Critical Reflection and Social Interrogation: Art functions as a powerful mirror and provocation, challenging entrenched political orthodoxies, questioning injustices, preserving cultural memory, and expanding human empathy across time and geography.

Why the Man’s Name is Not Mentioned in The Andhi Khola

In Ramesh Vikal’s realist short story The Andhi Khola (The Blind River), the protagonist’s name is deliberately left unmentioned to elevate him into a universal archetype:

• By keeping the struggling porter nameless, Vikal emphasizes that his tragedy is not an isolated individual misfortune, but the collective plight of thousands of impoverished, landless, and displaced rural Nepalese laborers.
• His namelessness mirrors his socio-economic invisibility within a callous, feudal society that exploits his grueling labor while remaining utterly indifferent to his identity, suffering, and survival along the turbulent river.

Phrasal Verbs Matched to Academic Verbs

1. go on $\to$ c. continue
2. go up $\to$ d. increase
3. look into $\to$ b. study (or investigate)
4. leave out $\to$ a. exclude

How the Gods Appear in B.P. Koirala’s A Tale

In B.P. Koirala’s celebrated short story A Tale (Ek Katha), the gods appear not as distant, sanctimonious abstractions, but as living forces intimately entwined with earthly human passions and the primordial energies of nature:

• Koirala demystifies the divine, exploring how sacred spiritual penance (tapasya) and worldly sensual desires (kama) are fundamentally connected.
• When the ascetic sage meditates in the dense forest, the divine entities manifest through the intoxicating beauty of nature, erotic allure, and the sensory world, illustrating Koirala’s existential thesis that true spiritual transcendence cannot be attained by repressing natural human instincts, but by acknowledging their profound power.

Corrected Spelling Mistakes

a. <u>By</u> leading comfortable lives, people may be endangering <u>future</u> generations. (Corrections: “Bye” $\to$ By; “futur” $\to$ future).

b. It is believed that the place <u>where</u> solar energy <u>would</u> be most effective is the Sahara. (Corrections: “were” $\to$ where; “wood” $\to$ would).

How the King is Defeated in The Empty Drum

In Leo Tolstoy’s The Empty Drum, the tyrannical King is defeated through the irresistible psychological enchantment of the magical drum:

• Having failed to execute Emelyan through impossible tasks, the enraged King marches out with his royal regiments to seize Emelyan’s wife and execute the peasant by military force.
• Emelyan steps forward and begins beating the hollow drum. The moment the hypnotic rhythm sounds, the King’s soldiers break ranks, disobey their monarch, and march joyfully behind Emelyan.
• Seeing his entire military apparatus dissolve and turn against him, the humiliated King flees into exile, completely stripped of royal power.

Completed Sentences with Suitable Linkers and Conditions

a. Individuals should be allowed to do whatever they like provided that their actions do not harm others or infringe upon public laws. (Linker: provided that / as long as introducing a protective legal condition).

b. Risk is acceptable in the workplace as long as comprehensive health and safety regulations are strictly enforced. (Linker: as long as / on condition that introducing an occupational risk threshold).

Why Camus Says Sisyphus is Happy & Critical Agreement

In The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus asserts that Sisyphus is happy because he achieves conscious triumph over his tragic fate through revolt and lucidity:

• Camus’s Rationale: When Sisyphus descends the mountain to retrieve the stone, he is fully conscious of his absurd condition. Because he acknowledges his punishment without appealing to false gods or sinking into despair, he claims the rock and the struggle as his own. His defiance negates the gods’ power to torture him, filling his heart with purposeful rebellion.
• Do You Agree?:
  • In Agreement: One can agree with Camus that happiness is not the absence of struggle, but the presence of lucid self-determination and dignity. Even in monotonous or painful circumstances, asserting agency transforms suffering into triumph.
  • Alternative Perspective: Alternatively, from a realist psychological perspective, perpetual, fruitless labor inevitably induces psychological exhaustion, suggesting that Camus’s assertion is a romanticized existential ideal rather than an attainable human state.

Synonyms Closest in Meaning

a. initial $\to$ original (Options: subsequent / original / unusual. ‘Initial’ and ‘original’ both refer to the first stage, beginning, or earliest state).

b. offshore $\to$ on the sea (Options: underground / on the sea / on the beach. ‘Offshore’ refers to activities, installations, or winds situated or taking place at sea away from the coast).

Symmetry of Attitude and Anger in Manto’s The Dog of Titwal

In The Dog of Titwal, Saadat Hasan Manto deliberately portrays the Indian soldiers (under Subedar Himmat Singh) and the Pakistani soldiers (under Subedar Subhan Singh) as mirror reflections of each other, identical in their mindset, boredom, and hostility:

---

1. Shared Human Background and Cultural Habits

• Both military camps occupy the same breathtaking Kashmiri hills, listen to the same autumn winds, eat identical camp rations, and sing the exact same romantic and nostalgic Punjabi folk songs (Heer).
• In their mundane moments, both sides experience the same soul-crushing boredom, homesickness, and yearning for normal human life.

---

2. Symmetrical Jingoism and Irrational Paranoia

• When the innocent stray dog wanders between their trenches, both camps react with identical chauvinistic paranoia:
  • The Indian soldiers tie a sign around its neck naming it “Chun-Chun” and proclaiming it an “Indian dog.”
  • The Pakistani soldiers interpret this as a provocative national insult, renaming the dog “Bhadun” and declaring it a “Pakistani dog.”
• Neither side sees the dog as a living, hungry creature; both reduce it to a political canvas upon which to project their mutual enmity.

---

3. Manto’s Political and Moral Critique

• By demonstrating that both camps possess identical anger, identical slogans, and identical cruelty—culminating in soldiers on both sides laughing as they fire rifle bullets into the fleeing dog—Manto strips the 1947 Partition of all heroic pretensions.
• He exposes nationalistic hatred as an artificial, manufactured madness imposed upon people who share the same blood, culture, and humanity, rendering the violence completely absurd.

Symbolism and Universal Archetypes in Edward Albee’s The Sandbox

Edward Albee’s one-act play The Sandbox (1960) is a seminal work of the American Theatre of the Absurd that offers a searing satire on bourgeois familial callousness and the alienation of the elderly.

---

1. The Multi-Layered Symbolism of the Sandbox

• The Grave / Death: The primary symbol is the sandbox itself. Positioned in the middle of a barren beach beneath a theatrical spotlight, it functions as a literal grave. When Mommy and Daddy dump Grandma into the sandbox, they are callously burying her alive while feigning ritual grief.
• Childhood Regress / Infantilization: A sandbox is a children’s play area. Putting an eighty-six-year-old grandmother into a sandbox symbolizes how modern society infantilizes, devalues, and patronizes the elderly once their economic utility ceases.
• Artificiality of Bourgeois Life: The theatrical props—the painted sky, the recorded music, and the hollow eulogies—symbolize the artificial, plastic nature of modern family relations.

---

2. Why Characters Lack Specific Names

Albee intentionally names his characters Mommy, Daddy, Grandma, Young Man, and Musician:

• Universal Societal Archetypes: By omitting individual names, Albee transforms the family from a specific household into a universal archetype of the modern American middle-class family.
• Loss of Individuality: The lack of names highlights how consumerist society strips people of unique identity, reducing them to shallow social functions and empty roles. Mommy represents domineering, materialistic authority; Daddy represents passive, emasculated complicity; and Grandma represents discarded generational wisdom.

Matching Medical Terms and Definitions

---

Key Pairings Summary

• a $\to$ 3 (disease epidemic $\to$ widespread outbreak affecting large populations)
• b $\to$ 5 (drug dependency $\to$ inability to function without medication/substance)
• c $\to$ 2 (preventable illness $\to$ avoidable disease through lifestyle/hygiene)
• d $\to$ 1 (cosmetic surgery $\to$ surgical procedure enhancing physical appearance)
• e $\to$ 4 (patent $\to$ intellectual property exclusive commercial right)

Drawbacks of Compulsory Education and Pathways to Reform (The Right to Control One’s Learning)

In his radical treatise The Right to Control One’s Learning, educational reformer John Holt identifies the coercive nature of institutional schooling as the principal impediment to genuine human intellect:

---

1. Drawbacks of Compulsory Education

1. Destruction of Intrinsic Curiosity and Joy of Learning: When children are forced to learn standardized curricula under threat of penalty and bad marks, learning becomes an exhausting chore. Intrinsic curiosity is replaced by cynical performance aimed strictly at passing exams.
2. Violation of Fundamental Human Liberty: Holt argues that dictating what a child must think and memorize is an invasive infringement on bodily and cognitive autonomy:

   “The right to control one’s own learning is the right to decide what goes into one’s own mind. To deny this right is to treat a person as a slave or an animal.”

3. Institutionalization of Fear, Anxiety, and Passivity: Schooling operates through fear—fear of humiliation, failure, and teacher disapproval. This conditions youth to become passive, submissive citizens who wait for external authority figures to tell them what to do.

---

2. How These Drawbacks Can Be Minimized or Eliminated

• Decriminalizing Self-Directed Education (Unschooling): Abolish compulsory attendance laws, recognizing homeschooling, unschooling, and self-directed study as legitimate educational pathways.
• Community-Based Open Learning Centers: Transform communities into rich learning ecologies with open libraries, scientific laboratories, makerspaces, and athletic complexes accessible to learners of all ages without mandatory syllabi.
• Apprenticeships and Real-World Integration: Connect youth directly with craftspeople, businesses, artists, and researchers so they gain practical, authentic skills driven by their personal passions.

Matching Art and Design Adjectives to Definitions

---

Key Pairings Summary

• 1 $\to$ e (abstract $\to$ non-representational, conceptual)
• 2 $\to$ c (decorative $\to$ ornamental, beautifying)
• 3 $\to$ d (avant-garde $\to$ experimental, innovative)
• 4 $\to$ a (monumental $\to$ immense, grand in scale)
• 5 $\to$ b (figurative $\to$ representational of real-world forms)

Rearranged Words to Form Coherent Noun Phrases

a. a/list/dishes/of/traditional $\to$ a list of traditional dishes

b. programs/ cookery/ television $\to$ television cookery programs

c. allergies/ and/ increase/ in/ noticeable/ a / diabetes $\to$ a noticeable increase in allergies and diabetes

d. preparation/ time/a/ of/ deal/ great/and $\to$ a great deal of preparation time (or: a great deal of time and preparation)

e. g/of/fruits/variety/ new (recognizing ‘g’ as typographical artifact for ‘a’) $\to$ a new variety of fruits

Active Childhood vs. Mythic Manhood in e. e. cummings’s In Just-

In his celebrated modernist poem In Just-, e. e. cummings crafts a vivid seasonal celebration of spring based upon a stark structural and philosophical contrast between youthful dynamism and archaic, limping adult maturity:

---

1. Active Childhood: Spontaneous Vitality and Movement

• The children embody kinetic energy, innocence, and joyful motion. As the world awakens “mud-luscious” and “puddle-wonderful,” the boys (eddieandbill) run from playing marbles and piracies, while the girls (bettyandisbel) dance away from jump-rope and hopscotch.
• Cummings runs their names together with typographically compressed syntax to mirror their rapid, uninhibited games and boundless camaraderie in the spring sunshine.

---

2. Adult Manhood: Lethargy, Physical Limitation, and Mythic Gravity

• In sharp contrast to the leaping children stands the “balloonman”:
  • He is described as “little,” “lame,” and “old,” moving slowly and with difficulty.
  • His call is not energetic but a whistling that sounds “far and wee.”
• Crucially, cummings characterizes him as “goat-footed”, an explicit allusion to Pan, the ancient Greek mythological god of wild nature, sexuality, and shepherds.

---

3. Thematic Significance of the Contrast

• The contrast transcends a simple comparison between youthful play and adult tiredness. The lame balloonman represents the inescapable transition from childhood innocence toward adult consciousness, sexual awakening, and mortality.
• His eerie whistle acts as an irresistible lure, calling the vibrant children away from their innocent playground games into the mysterious, Pan-like forest of adulthood.

Chief Seattle’s Holistic Worldview and Its Deep Resonance with Nepali Cultural Values

Chief Seattle’s iconic 1854 oration A Change of Worlds stands as one of the most eloquent articulations of indigenous ecological philosophy, presenting an understanding of land, religion, and cultural pride that sharply challenges Western anthropocentrism. A comparative analysis reveals extraordinary, profound parallels between Seattle’s worldview and the traditional cultural values of the Nepalese people.

---

1. Chief Seattle’s Views on Land, Religion, and Cultural Pride

• The Sacredness and Indivisibility of Land: Chief Seattle rejects the concept that land can be bought, sold, or partitioned like merchandise. To the Native American, every rock, river, pine needle, and patch of soil is holy, pulsing with the ancestral memory of his people:

  “How can you buy or sell the sky, the warmth of the land? The idea is strange to us... The earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth.”

• Living, Experiential Religion: Unlike the written commandments of the White Man’s God carved on stone tablets, Seattle’s religion is woven directly into the living biosphere—the whispers of the wind, the cycles of nature, and the spiritual presence of departed ancestors who continue to love and protect their native valleys.
• Cultural Pride and Ecological Dignity: Despite facing military subjugation and displacement by European expansion, Seattle maintains sovereign moral pride. He warns the conquerors that their triumph is transient: when the last Native person has perished, the ghosts of his people will still populate the quiet shores, because the living and the dead are forever linked to the land.

---

2. Comparison with the Cultural and Spiritual Values of Nepal

The worldview articulated by Chief Seattle finds deep, living resonance across Nepal’s diverse ethnic and religious landscape:

1. Veneration of Nature as Divine Mother (Bhoomi Mata): In Nepali Hindu, Buddhist, and indigenous traditions, the earth is revered as Dharti Mata (Mother Earth). Before building a house, tilling a field, or initiating construction, Nepalis perform Bhoomi Puja, asking the earth’s forgiveness for disturbing the soil—an exact philosophical parallel to Seattle’s insistence on treating the earth with filial reverence.
2. Sacred Rivers and Mountain Deities: Just as Seattle speaks of rivers as “our brothers” who quench our thirst and carry our canoes, the rivers of Nepal (the Bagmati, Gandaki, Koshi, and Karnali) are worshipped as living divine mothers. Similarly, the Himalayan peaks are revered as Chomolungma (Mother Goddess of the World) and the sacred abodes of Lord Shiva.
3. Indigenous Animism and Ancestor Worship: Indigenous Nepali communities—including the Kirat (Rai and Limbu celebrating Ubhauli and Udhauli in praise of nature and crops), Magar, Gurung, Tharu, and Newar—practice animistic ancestor veneration (Kul Puja), believing that ancestral spirits reside in the sacred groves, water springs (dharas), and family hearths, mirroring Seattle’s conviction that ancestral spirits never abandon their homeland.

---

3. Contemporary Significance

In an era of relentless commercial deforestation, haphazard urban encroachment, and climate-induced glacial flooding in the Himalayas, the shared ecological ethics of Chief Seattle and traditional Nepali culture serve as an urgent moral reminder: true progress lies not in the rapacious exploitation of nature, but in preserving our sacred covenant of stewardship with the living earth.

The Calculus of Uncertainty: Does Bigger Risk Lead to Greater Reward in Personal Life, Career, and Finance?

The relationship between risk and reward is a foundational concept across human psychology, career development, and modern finance. Popular aphorisms such as “fortune favors the bold” and “no risk, no return” suggest an unyielding linear correlation between the magnitude of risk undertaken and the bounty of subsequent rewards. However, a nuanced academic examination reveals that this premise is an oversimplification. While taking bold, calculated risks is frequently a prerequisite for non-linear breakthroughs, taking reckless or unmitigated risks often precipitates catastrophic failure.

The primary argument in favor of the “high risk, high reward” paradigm is rooted in the dynamics of competitive markets and human innovation. In corporate entrepreneurship, launching a disruptive technology or pioneering a completely uncharted market involves immense exposure to uncertainty and financial loss. Yet, as exemplified by technological pioneers and visionary venture capitalists, willingness to embrace existential risk is what yields transformative innovations and extraordinary wealth generation. Similarly, in career trajectories, stepping out of secure, conventional employment into freelance consultancy or executive leadership requires confronting substantial career vulnerability, but it simultaneously unlocks accelerated professional growth, creative autonomy, and elevated leadership stature.

Conversely, the argument against equating bigger risk with bigger reward exposes severe cognitive and economic fallacies, most notably survivorship bias. Society lionizes the single risk-taker who built a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, while remaining willfully blind to the thousands of equally daring individuals who suffered total bankruptcy, financial ruin, and chronic stress. In personal finance, taking extreme speculative risks—such as leveraged options trading, cryptocurrency speculation, or concentrated equity positions—frequently results in total capital wipeout rather than outsized wealth. Furthermore, in personal health and relationships, high-stakes gambles can permanently shatter physical well-being, trust, and mental equilibrium, where the downside is completely asymmetric to any potential gain.

The critical variable that distinguishes successful risk-taking from foolish gambling is risk intelligence and asymmetric risk management. Sophisticated decision-makers never take risks where the downside is existential or irreversible. Instead, they engineer asymmetric opportunities: scenarios characterized by capped, manageable downside risk coupled with limitless, exponential upside potential. In careers, this translates to taking bold lateral career moves while maintaining emergency financial reserves. In investment portfolios, it means anchoring capital in diversified foundational assets while allocating a disciplined, small percentage to high-growth, speculative ventures.

In my view, taking bigger risks does not automatically produce greater rewards; rather, mastering the discipline of calculated, mitigated risk creates the necessary conditions for extraordinary achievement. Blind risk-taking is a recipe for disaster. True success in personal life, professional careers, and financial management belongs to those who possess the courage to embrace uncertainty, the analytical rigor to calculate contingencies, and the resilience to survive temporary failures while preserving long-term strategic optionality.

The Plight of Womanhood Under Patriarchal Hegemony in Shenaaz Nanji’s Amina

In the short story Amina, the protagonist Amina serves as a poignant, haunting representative of the subjugated condition of women living under traditional, deeply entrenched patriarchal power structures. Through her experiences, the author exposes the systemic denial of female agency, bodily autonomy, and self-expression, compelling the reader into profound emotional sympathy.

---

1. Amina as a Representative of Patriarchal Oppression

Amina’s lived reality mirrors the structural inequalities endured by women across conservative patriarchal societies:

• Denial of Educational and Intellectual Autonomy: Amina’s natural intelligence, curiosity, and creative ambitions are systematically dismissed. In her domestic environment, a woman’s intellect is perceived as an inconvenience or an outright threat to male authority. Her destiny is pre-determined by male kin: confinement to household chores, childbearing, and unquestioning obedience.
• Commodification and Arranged Destiny: Amina is treated not as an autonomous human subject with individual desires, but as social property to be bartered in marriage alliances. Decisions concerning her body, her living arrangements, and her life partner are negotiated by patriarchal elders without her consent, reducing her personhood to a transactional commodity.
• The Culture of Enforced Silence: Under the patriarchal code, a “good woman” is defined by her submissiveness, docility, and silence. Whenever Amina attempts to articulate her feelings or question domestic injustice, she is silenced with moral condemnation, religious guilt, or threats of domestic ostracization.

---

2. Why We Sympathize With Amina

The reader’s deep sympathy for Amina is evoked through several powerful narrative and psychological dimensions:

1. Her Internal Resilience and Silent Dignity: Despite being surrounded by suffocating restrictions, Amina does not lose her inner moral clarity. Her internal monologues reveal a sensitive, perceptive soul that recognizes the profound injustice of her condition, preserving a quiet dignity even in moments of acute humiliation.
2. The Universality of Her Tragedy: We sympathize with Amina because her suffering is not a relic of distant fiction, but a tragic reality that millions of young women continue to face across the developing world today. Her longing for simple dignity, mutual respect, and basic human freedom resonates universally.
3. The Agony of Crushed Potential: The most heartbreaking aspect of Amina’s narrative is the systematic extinguishment of her youthful potential. Watching a bright, vibrant spirit slowly resigned to domestic servitude evokes deep moral outrage and righteous empathy in the reader.

---

3. Conclusion

Amina’s story is a compelling indictment of patriarchal oppression. By giving voice to her quiet pain, the author demonstrates that genuine societal development remains impossible as long as half of humanity is stripped of their fundamental right to self-determination.

The Primacy of Green Environments: Safeguarding Public Health, Communities, and Planetary Equilibrium

As accelerated urbanization, industrial emissions, and deforestation intensify global climate instability, the imperative to cultivate and protect green environments has emerged as one of the defining challenges of the twenty-first century. A green environment—characterized by preserved forest cover, urban tree canopies, biodiverse wetlands, and sustainable land use—is not merely an aesthetic luxury, but the indispensable life-support system required for biological health, vibrant communities, and planetary equilibrium. Adopting comprehensive eco-friendly practices is our most potent strategy to combat rampant environmental pollution and reverse climate breakdown.

First and foremost, green environments are fundamental to human physiological and mental health. Urban trees, vegetation, and natural wetlands function as nature’s biological filtration plants. Tree foliage intercepts hazardous airborne particulates ($PM_{2.5}$ and $PM_{10}$), absorbs noxious gases such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, and releases life-sustaining oxygen. Studies in public health demonstrate that communities situated near green spaces exhibit drastically reduced rates of asthma, cardiovascular illnesses, and childhood respiratory disorders. Moreover, exposure to natural green surroundings triggers immediate neurobiological benefits, lowering cortisol levels, alleviating chronic clinical stress, and enhancing cognitive focus through biophilic design.

Beyond individual health, green environments cultivate resilient, harmonious, and economically vibrant communities. Urban parks, community forests, and green corridors serve as inclusive public commons where citizens from diverse socio-economic backgrounds recreate, exercise, and socialize, fostering civic trust and social cohesion. Ecologically, urban green infrastructure mitigates the lethal “urban heat island” effect, cooling ambient city temperatures by several degrees Celsius through natural shading and evapotranspiration. Furthermore, permeable vegetated soil and urban wetlands act as natural stormwater buffers, absorbing torrential rainfall and preventing disastrous urban flash floods and soil erosion.

On a macro-planetary scale, eco-friendly practices are indispensable in combating global pollution and mitigating climate change. Terrestrial forests and oceanic ecosystems operate as the primary carbon sinks of the biosphere, sequestering billions of metric tons of anthropogenic carbon dioxide annually. Embracing sustainable practices—such as transitioning to solar and wind energy, eliminating single-use petrochemical plastics, enforcing circular industrial waste management, and regenerative agriculture—directly chokes off pollution at its industrial source. In mountainous countries like Nepal, the preservation of community forests has proven globally celebrated as a decentralized mechanism that recharges freshwater watersheds, prevents catastrophic mountain landslides, and protects endangered flora and fauna.

In conclusion, investing in a green environment is an essential prerequisite for sustainable civilizational survival. A clean, vegetated biosphere rejuvenates human physical and psychological well-being, strengthens community resilience against climate shocks, and preserves the intricate biological tapestry of our planet. By institutionalizing eco-friendly policies and cultivating personal environmental stewardship, contemporary society can construct an equitable, regenerative world where economic prosperity coexists in enduring harmony with the natural earth.